<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RoughlyDrafted Magazine &#187; the Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/category/the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Eccentric but effective Steve Jobs pitches iPad to NYT execs</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/02/04/eccentric-but-effective-steve-jobs-pitches-ipad-to-nyt-execs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/02/04/eccentric-but-effective-steve-jobs-pitches-ipad-to-nyt-execs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prince McLean, AppleInsider
Apple booked a quiet dinner reception for fifty executives at the New York Times, but the VIP guest ended up being Steve Jobs.
Eccentric but effective Steve Jobs pitches iPad to NYT execs
.
The gathering, as reported by New York magazine, was booked at Pranna, a cellar basement restaurant featuring a southeast Asian menu. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/02/04/eccentric-but-effective-steve-jobs-pitches-ipad-to-nyt-execs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strand Consult: Denmark&#8217;s illegitimate iPhone-angry pundit-nutter</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/strand-consult-denmarks-illegitimate-iphone-angry-pundit-nutter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/strand-consult-denmarks-illegitimate-iphone-angry-pundit-nutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger
When the iPhone first appeared in 2007, a variety of pundits and analysts lined up to explain why Apple would fail. Having been since proven wrong, they&#8217;ve mostly slinked off into quiet obscurity, except for John Strand. He&#8217;s wrong, here&#8217;s why.
.

Strand and his one-man consultancy, Strand Consult, is the Danish version of Rob [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/strand-consult-denmarks-illegitimate-iphone-angry-pundit-nutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gizmodo&#8217;s incredibly naive Jesus Diaz compares Apple&#8217;s corporate security to Nazi Gestapo</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/gizmodos-incredibly-naive-jesus-diaz-compares-apples-corporate-security-to-nazi-gestapo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/gizmodos-incredibly-naive-jesus-diaz-compares-apples-corporate-security-to-nazi-gestapo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger
According to Gizmodo, Apple&#8217;s rather routine internal efforts to secure its trade secrets and the details of its product development plans exposed to the employees who work for it are somehow comparable to the oppressive police state brutality carried out by the Nazi Gestapo and KGB secret police against citizens. He&#8217;s wrong to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/12/15/gizmodos-incredibly-naive-jesus-diaz-compares-apples-corporate-security-to-nazi-gestapo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Apple&#8217;s iPhone subscription accounting changes</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/21/inside-apples-iphone-subscription-accounting-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/21/inside-apples-iphone-subscription-accounting-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger
Apple&#8217;s April 2007 Q2 earnings call announced that the company planned to book revenue for its new iPhone and Apple TV using the “subscription method of accounting,” a decision that startled analysts and left many users confused. Here&#8217;s what resulted and why the company is working to reverse the decision.
Inside Apple&#8217;s iPhone subscription [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/21/inside-apples-iphone-subscription-accounting-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast: Zune HD, Flip video and the iPod nano</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/09/17/podcast-zune-hd-flip-video-and-the-ipod-nano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/09/17/podcast-zune-hd-flip-video-and-the-ipod-nano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod & iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Gene Steinberg of the Tech Night Owl invited me to talk about Zune HD, Flip video and the iPod nano&#8217;s camcorder. You can tune into the live stream Thursday September 17 at 6 PM PST, or listen to podcast episodes via iTunes, and subscribe to the Tech Night Owl RSS feed at:
The Tech Night Owl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/09/17/podcast-zune-hd-flip-video-and-the-ipod-nano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_090618.mp3" length="43288153" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_090521.mp3" length="43287590" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_090319.mp3" length="43286743" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_090226.mp3" length="43287648" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_090108.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_081016.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080501.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080731.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080612.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080320.mp3" length="43200470" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080131.mp3" length="43203106" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_080103.mp3" length="43204203" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_071108.mp3" length="43203106" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_070920.mp3" length="43201695" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_070809.mp3" length="43204706" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_070614.mp3" length="43207369" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_070426.mp3" length="43207369" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/nightowllive/www.techbroadcasting.com/podcasts/nightowl_070301.mp3" length="43209720" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News reports new Mac virus that is neither Mac nor viral nor new</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/30/fox-news-reports-new-mac-virus-that-is-neither-mac-nor-viral-nor-new/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/30/fox-news-reports-new-mac-virus-that-is-neither-mac-nor-viral-nor-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger
A report published by Fox News says that “online criminals are apparently so impressed with its scorching sales they are sending Macintosh computers an attack typically aimed at” Windows PCs. The story then falls apart in series of inept contradictions.
.
Fox published the story under a headlined expertly designed to &#8216;electrify the base&#8217; by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/30/fox-news-reports-new-mac-virus-that-is-neither-mac-nor-viral-nor-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s paying Brett Arends to malign Apple?</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/21/whos-paying-brett-arends-to-malign-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/21/whos-paying-brett-arends-to-malign-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger
Brett Arends, the notorious shill who filed discredited attacks on the iPhone launch in Jim Cramer&#8217;s the Street listing “Five reasons not to buy an iPhone” and attacking the new phone at its launch for supposedly costing buyers “$17,670,” is now printing his fully unsubstantiated opinions on Apple in the Wall Street Journal.
.
“Apple [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/07/21/whos-paying-brett-arends-to-malign-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The EFF&#8217;s Oddly Informed War Apple&#8217;s iPhone Apps</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/03/the-effs-oddly-informed-war-apples-iphone-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/03/the-effs-oddly-informed-war-apples-iphone-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Eran Dilger
An Electronic Frontier Foundation blogger has once again managed to malign the EFF&#8217;s own laudable mission as an organization in order to deliver an over the top, incendiary screed about Apple and the iPhone app review process. This time it&#8217;s personal, due to an EFF-related iPhone app rejection, but they&#8217;re wrong, here&#8217;s why.
.
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/03/the-effs-oddly-informed-war-apples-iphone-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Macs more Safe than Secure? No</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/16/are-macs-more-safe-than-secure-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/16/are-macs-more-safe-than-secure-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger

Everyone seems to get lost in their own words when talking about security and Apple. The Daring Fireball recently cited security blogger Dennis Fisher, who insisted it was “demonstrably false” to say there were not “any virus attacks on Macs.” However, rather than pointing out what a horrible pile of trash Fisher&#8217;s article [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/16/are-macs-more-safe-than-secure-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Windows 7 is Microsoft&#8217;s next Zune</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/09/why-windows-7-is-microsofts-next-zune/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/09/why-windows-7-is-microsofts-next-zune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Daniel Eran Dilger

Every once and a while I get the opportunity to appear brilliantly prescient by pointing out something that is blatantly obvious but which has been so obscured by valiant marketing efforts that it makes me look like a grand wizard at detecting emperor nakedness just to say it. In this case, it&#8217;s that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/05/09/why-windows-7-is-microsofts-next-zune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
