Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Inside Apple’s 2011: iPod, iPhone & iPad

Daniel Eran Dilger

This year, Apple’s mobile iOS platform reached its fifth annual release, adding new support for subscription content, iCloud, and new devices including the iPad 2, a CDMA iPhone 4 and the global iPhone 4S with Siri voice assistance. Meanwhile, the iPod line got no major updates for the first time in its history, as Apple continues to convert its iPod business into iOS device sales.
.

.
Record sales of iOS devices

In 2011, Apple’s sales of iOS devices surged so dramatically during the launch cycles of new iPad 2 and iPhone 4S models that the company’s demolishing of its previous year’s quarterly records–and its annihilation of all competitors’ sales–in prelaunch quarters wasn’t enough to prevent critics from voicing their disappointment.

During the company’s fiscal Q2 launch of iPad 2, Apple sold “only” 4.69 million tablets as it scrambled to build enough devices to meet demand for the new model. In the year ago quarter of 2010, Apple wasn’t selling any iPads because it hadn’t even introduced the product yet.

In contrast, Microsoft’s decade old Tablet PC business, recycled last year under “Slate PC” branding with partner HP, completely collapsed, sending the company back to the drawing board to revamp its Windows 7 tablet platform for a second try expected to appear possibly as soon as the end of 2012, leaving it missing in action throughout the entire launch year of iPad 2 (and its next successor).

Despite desperate efforts by Samsung to portray its 2010 winter Galaxy Tab sales as “quite smooth,” and Motorola’s Xoom ads portraying Apple’s iPad first as a museum relic and then as a tool for propagating a dreary dystopian world, neither companys’ tablet products had any impact on Apple’s sales in 2011, failing completely on their own with dismal sales.

Google’s rushed release of Android 3.0 Honeycomb, focused exclusively on producing tablets that could challenge the iPad this year, itself collapsed alongside Slate PC after waves of failed attempts by its licensees to deliver tablet devices capable of gaining a healthy fraction of Apple’s “disappointing” Q2 iPad sales.

Android 3.0 Honeycomb more like Tablet PC than iPad
RIM and HP similarly attempted to jump on the tablet bandwagon driven by Apple’s iPad, but even after ditching Microsoft’s Windows 7 for Palm’s webOS, HP couldn’t manage to effectively launch even an initial foundation for its own tablet platform. After many delays, RIM finally launched an actual product in 2011, but its PlayBook failed miserably as well. The design ended up being resold by Amazon in a scaled down version with a year old, customized version of Android 2.x tied to Amazon’s store and sold as a loss leader under the Kindle Fire brand.

Similarly, in its fall fiscal Q4, Apple “only” sold 17.07 million iPhones, sending analysts into confused disappointment for not reaching their forecasts of 20 million smartphones in a quarter where the company had delayed the launch of its new iPhone 4S while it continued outselling every other smartphone on the US market with its year old iPhone 4 and the second place, two year old iPhone 3GS.

Apple’s iOS sales grew tremendously in 2011 even as the sales of leading smartphone makers Nokia and RIM collapsed. Efforts by Microsoft to sell Windows Phone 7 and by HP to ship webOS smartphones both failed to gain any traction this year, leaving Apple’s mobile platform to be compared solely against the communal efforts of the rest of the entire industry working with an open source project.

Even so, all the efforts of every vendor globally using some aspect of Google’s Android software still couldn’t match the unit sales of Apple’s iOS platform, and were not even remotely comparable to the revenues and profits Apple’s iOS generated in 2011. Conversely, however, Apple was not regularly lavished with praise for having collected overwhelming “market share” among web browsers just for being the central repository for the maintenance of its WebKit open source project used within the majority of mobile browsers and, in 2011, the majority of desktop browsers as well.

iPod iced, reanimated as an iOS app

Apple’s iPod dynasty, which ruled over the past decade in the field of portable media players, contracted significantly in fiscal 2011, dropping from last year’s sales plateau of 50.3 million down to 42.6 million units this year. That didn’t offer any hope for competitors however, because Apple essentially had just converted many of its iPod sales to even higher margin iOS devices running the iPod app.

Over half of the iPods Apple now sells are the iOS-based iPod touch, and Apple now sells far more iPhones and iPads per quarter than all iPods combined. Had Apple simply branded its other iOS devices as “iPod phone” and “iPod tablet,” it could have reported sales of 34.8 million “iPod” devices in its most recent “disappointing” quarter, a unit increase of more than 27 percent over its previous quarterly record sales of 27.34 million devices in the year ago quarter, rather than the 27 percent decline in in the sales of “iPod branded devices” when excluding the iPhone and iPad.

This year, Microsoft finally threw in the towel on its Zune brand of media players. But Apple itself also ended the reign of its “iPod classic” using a conventional hard drive and click wheel navigation, the original design that had propelled Apple Computer into consumer devices and ultimately erased the “computer” designation from its corporate name. While not officially discontinued and still on sale though out the 2011 holiday season, the iPod classic wasn’t even mentioned during Apple’s October iPod event.

iPod lineup
Even more tellingly, in 2011 Apple for the first time failed to significantly overhaul any its iPod-branded lineup, leaving in place its 2010, sixth generation iPod nano with only minor software adjustments, giving its fourth generation iPod touch just a new white option and leaving its iPod shuffle completely unchanged, apart from lower prices.

Apple also noted that it has now sold over 300 million iPods worldwide over the past decade, but it has also revealed in the same month that 250 million iOS devices have been sold since the iPhone first appeared in 2007, highlighting the remarkable sales growth Apple has experienced, and the tremendous shift it has made from selling simple hard drive music players to building advanced mobile computers capable of powering a ecosystem of apps.

A new generation of iOS devices

Along with the fourth generation iPod touch (based on the 2010 iPhone 4), Apple left its “other” iOS hardware, the second generation Apple TV, unchanged from last fall. However, both remained big sellers, with the revised Apple TV taking the lead among a crowded field of “connected TV boxes.” Last year, Google threatened to take away Apple’s “hobby” with its Android-based Google TV platform, but that initiative failed as badly as this year’s Android 3.0 Honeycomb tablets, if not worse, and didn’t recover at all this year.

Apple TV
Apple started 2011 with the January unveiling of a CDMA-version of iPhone 4 capable of working on the Verizon Wireless network in the US. The launch not only greatly expanded Apple’s reachable audience of potential smartphone buyers in the US, but was later also sold through Sprint and other CDMA providers globally.

The company then focused on a dramatic enhancement of its existing, barely year old iPad in March. Steve Jobs introduced the new iPad 2 after noting that Apple had sold 15 million iPads in its first nine months, more than all sales of Microsoft’s Tablet PCs across the past decade.

iPad 2 1
Rather than being a minor update, Jobs presented an entirely new, thinner and lighter form factor powered by a dual core A5 processor with up to 9 times the graphics performance and sporting dual cameras capable of FaceTime video conferencing, all while maintaining the same price and battery life. The new iPad 2 also delivered VGA and HDMI 1080p video mirroring and a magnetic Smart Cover.
iPad 2
While pitted against a series of 4G LTE smartphones equipped with dual core processors introduced by competitors early in the year, Apple continued to top the smartphone sales charts with its existing 3G, single core iPhone 4 models throughout 2011, up until the later than usual October release of the iPhone 4S.

The new 4S incorporated the same dual core A5 chip used in iPad 2, as well as the same 1080p video mirroring features. It added an enhanced 1080p video camera with faster startup and video image stabilization and temporal noise reduction, as well as packing both CDMA and GSM/UMTS/14.4 HSDPA mobile network capabilities, making it a global phone model. The new phone also added support for Bluetooth 4.0, joining the 2011 MacBook Air and Mac mini in being able to connect to a new generation of low power devices.

The new model also enabled Apple to differentiate sales of the existing iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS by price, offering a series of iPhone options ranging from free to $99 to $199-$399 under contract in the US, the first time Apple has offered a free iPhone, and the widest range of iPhone prices ever presented.

Late 2010 iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPhone 4S feature comparison

The biggest new feature of iPhone 4S, however, is its Siri voice assistant, a new app that straddles the line between being an integrated part of the iOS interface and being a cloud computing service. The new phone also debuted alongside the release of iOS 5, which Apple broadly made available to existing devices dating back to 2009, the longest support period offered by any modern mobile platform vendor. In fact, Apple’s advancements of iOS throughout 2011 are significant enough to warrant their own report Inside Apple’s 2011, coming up next.

Inside Apple’s 2011: Mac hardware and Mac OS X

4 comments

1 jmfree { 12.29.11 at 10:46 pm }

Apple is showing itself to be the equivalent of the “smartest kid in the class” thus engendering the resentment of the half-bright students who just can’t seem to get it.

We have all been beneficiaries of this inventiveness and drive, both Apple customers and non-customers. I say this largely because I see the company as resetting the age-old standard of the square deal: you pay your good money to get something that works. Except that they are doing this in computing, telecommunications, and multimedia simultaneously.

Thank you, as always, for these great overviews and all the hard work that goes into them.

2 bft { 12.30.11 at 8:01 am }

“… I see the company as resetting the age-old standard of the square deal: you pay your good money to get something that works.”

Yes! I think a huge part of Apple’s success is that they do business the old-fashioned way: build a good product and back it up with good customer service. Customer service that (mostly) treats a person with dignity and not like a rube and a statistic.

3 The Mad Hatter { 12.31.11 at 1:30 pm }

Apple also noted that it has now sold over 300 million iPods worldwide over the past decade, but it has also revealed in the same month that 250 million iOS devices have been sold since the iPhone first appeared in 2007, highlighting the remarkable sales growth Apple has experienced, and the tremendous shift it has made from selling simple hard drive music players to building advanced mobile computers capable of powering a ecosystem of apps.

And this is what has Microsoft terrified. You can do everything with your IPhone, IPad, Android Phone, Android Tablet, insert operating system name here phone or tablet. The problem from Microsoft’s viewpoint is that Apple has proven that using Windows is the wrong way to build a Mobile device.

Other companies confirmed this. Amazon with the various Kindles, Barnes & Noble with the various Nooks. Admittedly the ereaders are limited devices, not general purpose computers, but they didn’t use Windows.

Steve “there’s a kind of hush” Ballmer must be ready to scream.

Wayne
http://madhatter.ca

4 vanfruniken { 01.01.12 at 4:43 am }

I am still waiting for a consistent file model, so that I don’t have to concoct workarounds, often dependent on the file type at hand, just to be able to carry a file with me. Remember, iDisk is on the way out.

Another concern is, what are you to do if you want to phase out your desktop computer (possibly with multiple users) and go iOS (think iPad)-only. Not everybody has system management capabilities to find workarounds.

A similar reasoning holds with aTV. I bought one and am exploring the possibilities. Now I can do similar things with the cable ISP pvr settop box, my AppleTV, and the (Samsung)TV itself, which also can take all kinds of signal sources (including USB sticks to play movies).
Why this artificial difference between iTunes content and files proper? (OK, maybe Apple has agreements to include DRM for that part of the iTunes content that come from the iTunes store, but the GUI is the same for your own imported content. What about using the same GUI to access OTHER content? What about DVD playing on the computer? Why do I have to rip my DVDs in order to be able to stream them? I’ll do it anyway)

Now I have 3 remotes, none of which can control everything. I can stream movies from my iPad and from my Mac (using AirPlay and the Air Video app), — though only at 720p. I am waiting for Apple to provide an all encompassing way to connect to ALL my content, through ONE GUI. I hope that my new aTV2 will get some of these features through software updates, rather than being left behind for an aTV3. (Obviously, an aTV3 will do 1080p, but I can live with 720p from the aTV2, for the time being).

You must log in to post a comment.