<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: Antennagate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnWatkins</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31142</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWatkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31142</guid>
		<description>A coating like that would work. But it&#039;s only possible to apply during production and is not a solution for the several million phones already out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A coating like that would work. But it&#8217;s only possible to apply during production and is not a solution for the several million phones already out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowededwookie</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31138</link>
		<dc:creator>lowededwookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31138</guid>
		<description>Yeah and what&#039;s the cost of a diamond like compound? Is it cost effective enough for Apple to use on their products?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah and what&#8217;s the cost of a diamond like compound? Is it cost effective enough for Apple to use on their products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enzos</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31137</link>
		<dc:creator>enzos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31137</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, Mr Wookie,
.. By mixing these polytypes in various ways at the nanoscale level of structure, DLC coatings ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-like_carbon ) can be made that at the same time are amorphous, flexible, and yet purely sp3 bonded &quot;diamond&quot;. The hardest, strongest, and slickest is such a mixture, known as tetrahedral amorphous carbon, or ta-C. For example, a coating of only 2 μm thickness of ta-C increases the resistance of common (i.e. type 304) stainless steel against abrasive wear; changing its lifetime in such service from one week to 85 years. .. If a DLC material is close enough to ta-C on plots of bonding ratios and hydrogen content it can be an insulator with a high value of resistivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, Mr Wookie,<br />
.. By mixing these polytypes in various ways at the nanoscale level of structure, DLC coatings ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-like_carbon" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-like_carbon</a> ) can be made that at the same time are amorphous, flexible, and yet purely sp3 bonded &#8220;diamond&#8221;. The hardest, strongest, and slickest is such a mixture, known as tetrahedral amorphous carbon, or ta-C. For example, a coating of only 2 μm thickness of ta-C increases the resistance of common (i.e. type 304) stainless steel against abrasive wear; changing its lifetime in such service from one week to 85 years. .. If a DLC material is close enough to ta-C on plots of bonding ratios and hydrogen content it can be an insulator with a high value of resistivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowededwookie</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31136</link>
		<dc:creator>lowededwookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31136</guid>
		<description>I have to say the coating idea is crap.

Any coating will rub off with use so then you&#039;re going to be back at square one.

That John Martellaro just seems to be a whiney idiot that was at Apple before the current golden times and he&#039;s annoyed by that. He never really offered anything of use.

He has a go at Apple for not offering a technical solution and yet comes up with nothing himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say the coating idea is crap.</p>
<p>Any coating will rub off with use so then you&#8217;re going to be back at square one.</p>
<p>That John Martellaro just seems to be a whiney idiot that was at Apple before the current golden times and he&#8217;s annoyed by that. He never really offered anything of use.</p>
<p>He has a go at Apple for not offering a technical solution and yet comes up with nothing himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnWatkins</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31126</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWatkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31126</guid>
		<description>Yeah I like FSJ too, but I hated lending him my eyeball time when I saw the crappy stuff he wrote elsewhere. can&#039;t believe he&#039;s still at Newsweek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I like FSJ too, but I hated lending him my eyeball time when I saw the crappy stuff he wrote elsewhere. can&#8217;t believe he&#8217;s still at Newsweek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckO</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31125</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31125</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame because Dan&#039;s pretty funny. FakeSteve was terrific in the beginning with the stuff about Bono and Larry Ellison and making up stuff about Steve&#039;s life in and outside of Apple. I don&#039;t get why he keeps getting involved in the technical side. He has no aptitude for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame because Dan&#8217;s pretty funny. FakeSteve was terrific in the beginning with the stuff about Bono and Larry Ellison and making up stuff about Steve&#8217;s life in and outside of Apple. I don&#8217;t get why he keeps getting involved in the technical side. He has no aptitude for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnWatkins</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31124</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWatkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31124</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone read anything Dan Lyons has to say?
He&#039;s a clueless, hit whoring, poseur.
It would be like listening to Jim Kramer&#039;s stock advice or Bill O&#039;Reily&#039;s &quot;news reports.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone read anything Dan Lyons has to say?<br />
He&#8217;s a clueless, hit whoring, poseur.<br />
It would be like listening to Jim Kramer&#8217;s stock advice or Bill O&#8217;Reily&#8217;s &#8220;news reports.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckO</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31123</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31123</guid>
		<description>Gene&#039;s a kook. I always get the feeling that he&#039;s bored doing the show and kind of half involved. He seems to get annoyed at random points in an interview like he&#039;s pissed he has to follow the other person&#039;s train of thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene&#8217;s a kook. I always get the feeling that he&#8217;s bored doing the show and kind of half involved. He seems to get annoyed at random points in an interview like he&#8217;s pissed he has to follow the other person&#8217;s train of thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31121</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad MacIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31121</guid>
		<description>Dang, that should have said IN SPITE of Gene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, that should have said IN SPITE of Gene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad MacIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/07/17/podcast-antennagate/comment-page-1/#comment-31120</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad MacIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4370#comment-31120</guid>
		<description>I listen to Tech Night Owl inspire of Gene. The man irritates me with his inane commentary and useless insights. And ads. Oh my goodness. So many ads. I only listen when Dan is on now. 

And as for there being nothing to talk about... That just isn&#039;t true! Has anyone else read the Dan Lyons article about why Apple are bastards over the whole antennagate press conference?

Anyhow. I guess I&#039;ll be back when there&#039;s something to read. 

Ciao.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listen to Tech Night Owl inspire of Gene. The man irritates me with his inane commentary and useless insights. And ads. Oh my goodness. So many ads. I only listen when Dan is on now. </p>
<p>And as for there being nothing to talk about&#8230; That just isn&#8217;t true! Has anyone else read the Dan Lyons article about why Apple are bastards over the whole antennagate press conference?</p>
<p>Anyhow. I guess I&#8217;ll be back when there&#8217;s something to read. </p>
<p>Ciao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

