<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anticipating the Apple Tablet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ten Myths of Apple&#8217;s iPad: 5. It&#8217;s just a Tablet PC or Kindle &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-24118</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Myths of Apple&#8217;s iPad: 5. It&#8217;s just a Tablet PC or Kindle &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-24118</guid>
		<description>[...] The Spectacular Failure of WinCE and Windows Mobile Anticipating the Apple Tablet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Spectacular Failure of WinCE and Windows Mobile Anticipating the Apple Tablet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefn</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23521</link>
		<dc:creator>stefn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23521</guid>
		<description>Added to the comment immediately above: App sales in general are projected by Gartner to rise to about $30 BILLION in 2013!

Here&#039;s my question: How much of that business is Apple going to hand over to Google without a fight? Google is pouring its proceeds into building inroads into Apple territory with good success.

What percentage of the app business in 2013 will be Apple&#039;s? Google&#039;s? others? 

And if it isn&#039;t subsidized pricing, as suggested above, how will Apple meet the Google challenge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added to the comment immediately above: App sales in general are projected by Gartner to rise to about $30 BILLION in 2013!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my question: How much of that business is Apple going to hand over to Google without a fight? Google is pouring its proceeds into building inroads into Apple territory with good success.</p>
<p>What percentage of the app business in 2013 will be Apple&#8217;s? Google&#8217;s? others? </p>
<p>And if it isn&#8217;t subsidized pricing, as suggested above, how will Apple meet the Google challenge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefn</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23434</link>
		<dc:creator>stefn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23434</guid>
		<description>Looking over all  the ebook readers announced at CES, Apple&#039;s tablet seems well timed. Here&#039;s why. (It&#039;s about the Tablet, trust me.)

The problem ebook publishing faces is that purchases are tied to one device. Yet print publishing will follow audio and video publishing, moving onto these devices, partly for reasons of DRM. (Hate DRM we will but accept it we must. How else can content creators get paid?)

So five years from now, most of our reading needs will be met with ebook devices. We will have 3-4 devices around the house and 1 to lend to a friend. For this to happen, the devices must be priced at $50-$250, depending on size, let&#039;s say small for books, big for newspapers.

The winner in this scenario can be Apple because it can produce the best-of-breed devices at prices no one else can meet. Why? Because Apple can subsidize these devices&#039; prices given their potential as purchasing monsters. In fact, they already are. Think music, movies, apps. But that&#039;s just the beginning. Think print, tickets, lattes, limos. 

Amazon has understood this and offered its best shot, in the Kindle, at an affordable device built for shopping as well as reading. But it&#039;s Amazon&#039;s job to sell atoms, not electrons. In a couple years we will see that Amazon&#039;s Kindle was merely a rough concept for Apple&#039;s Tablet and Touches. Amazon will sell us all the solid objects we buy but digital products and services will be Apple&#039;s territory. (All looked over by our advertising overlord Google.)

I think now&#039;s the time: if Apple produced Tablets for $250 and Touches for $50, it would rule these sectors.  None of the ebook readers announced this week could survive at these pricing levels. Nor can they sell all the products and services that Apple&#039;s devices can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking over all  the ebook readers announced at CES, Apple&#8217;s tablet seems well timed. Here&#8217;s why. (It&#8217;s about the Tablet, trust me.)</p>
<p>The problem ebook publishing faces is that purchases are tied to one device. Yet print publishing will follow audio and video publishing, moving onto these devices, partly for reasons of DRM. (Hate DRM we will but accept it we must. How else can content creators get paid?)</p>
<p>So five years from now, most of our reading needs will be met with ebook devices. We will have 3-4 devices around the house and 1 to lend to a friend. For this to happen, the devices must be priced at $50-$250, depending on size, let&#8217;s say small for books, big for newspapers.</p>
<p>The winner in this scenario can be Apple because it can produce the best-of-breed devices at prices no one else can meet. Why? Because Apple can subsidize these devices&#8217; prices given their potential as purchasing monsters. In fact, they already are. Think music, movies, apps. But that&#8217;s just the beginning. Think print, tickets, lattes, limos. </p>
<p>Amazon has understood this and offered its best shot, in the Kindle, at an affordable device built for shopping as well as reading. But it&#8217;s Amazon&#8217;s job to sell atoms, not electrons. In a couple years we will see that Amazon&#8217;s Kindle was merely a rough concept for Apple&#8217;s Tablet and Touches. Amazon will sell us all the solid objects we buy but digital products and services will be Apple&#8217;s territory. (All looked over by our advertising overlord Google.)</p>
<p>I think now&#8217;s the time: if Apple produced Tablets for $250 and Touches for $50, it would rule these sectors.  None of the ebook readers announced this week could survive at these pricing levels. Nor can they sell all the products and services that Apple&#8217;s devices can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grwisher</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23433</link>
		<dc:creator>grwisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23433</guid>
		<description>The Apple iSlate*, announcement on the 27th of January, will:
1) Run all of the native iPhone apps including support for MS Exchange support
2) Run 3rd party apps from the Apps Store** (130,000 and counting)
3) Have the same interface as the iPhone (includes iPod, internet, mail, etc.)
4) Use the same way to install apps
5) Use the same way to uninstall apps
6) Sync apps and data automatically to the individual&#039;s iPhone in realtime
7) Have Wifi, 3G and or tether to the individual&#039;s iPhone built in to the device
8) Support multi-tasking for all apps (including 3rd party apps)
9) Have a camera with flash and video capabilities
10) Have external mouse, keyboard and/or monitor capability
11) Provide enhanced music, movie and TV capabilities vs the iPhone (maybe 3D)
12) Provide enhanced gaming vs the iPhone
13) Provide enhanced traditional books and text book
14) Provide enhanced magazines and newspapers
15) Provide enhanced data base interaction (entry, retrieval, etc)
16) Have video conferencing built in (maybe a projector at some point)
17) Offer Mac versions of native software (iWork, iLife, Final Cut Express, Aperture, etc.
      which will sync to your Mac versions in realtime)
18) Offer Mac versions of 3rd party software (MS Office, Quickbooks, etc.
      which will sync to your Mac versions in realtime)
19) Have a FileMaker option available next year when FileMaker 11 is deployed
      (FileMaker is a wholly owned by Apple, Inc.)
20) Since this is a much larger version of the existing iPod Touch, there is plenty  of room for larger batteries, processors and other stuff

*iSlate may be called something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Apple iSlate*, announcement on the 27th of January, will:<br />
1) Run all of the native iPhone apps including support for MS Exchange support<br />
2) Run 3rd party apps from the Apps Store** (130,000 and counting)<br />
3) Have the same interface as the iPhone (includes iPod, internet, mail, etc.)<br />
4) Use the same way to install apps<br />
5) Use the same way to uninstall apps<br />
6) Sync apps and data automatically to the individual&#8217;s iPhone in realtime<br />
7) Have Wifi, 3G and or tether to the individual&#8217;s iPhone built in to the device<br />
8) Support multi-tasking for all apps (including 3rd party apps)<br />
9) Have a camera with flash and video capabilities<br />
10) Have external mouse, keyboard and/or monitor capability<br />
11) Provide enhanced music, movie and TV capabilities vs the iPhone (maybe 3D)<br />
12) Provide enhanced gaming vs the iPhone<br />
13) Provide enhanced traditional books and text book<br />
14) Provide enhanced magazines and newspapers<br />
15) Provide enhanced data base interaction (entry, retrieval, etc)<br />
16) Have video conferencing built in (maybe a projector at some point)<br />
17) Offer Mac versions of native software (iWork, iLife, Final Cut Express, Aperture, etc.<br />
      which will sync to your Mac versions in realtime)<br />
18) Offer Mac versions of 3rd party software (MS Office, Quickbooks, etc.<br />
      which will sync to your Mac versions in realtime)<br />
19) Have a FileMaker option available next year when FileMaker 11 is deployed<br />
      (FileMaker is a wholly owned by Apple, Inc.)<br />
20) Since this is a much larger version of the existing iPod Touch, there is plenty  of room for larger batteries, processors and other stuff</p>
<p>*iSlate may be called something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nat</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23413</link>
		<dc:creator>nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23413</guid>
		<description>@ ChuckO

I&#039;m imagining something closer to just the display-housing of a MacBook Air, except maybe a little bit thicker.

Here&#039;s hoping it&#039;s brushed aluminum or some other less scratch prone material, though preferably not polycarbonate plastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ChuckO</p>
<p>I&#8217;m imagining something closer to just the display-housing of a MacBook Air, except maybe a little bit thicker.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping it&#8217;s brushed aluminum or some other less scratch prone material, though preferably not polycarbonate plastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckO</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23412</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23412</guid>
		<description>Could this thing be as skinny or close to an iPhone? That seems important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this thing be as skinny or close to an iPhone? That seems important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mad Hatter</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23411</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Hatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23411</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Apple’s conventional notebooks are now significantly more expensive than bargain-bin PC laptops.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Actually they are less expensive, if you match features and capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Apple’s conventional notebooks are now significantly more expensive than bargain-bin PC laptops.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually they are less expensive, if you match features and capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23409</guid>
		<description>” Apple’s conventional notebooks are now significantly more expensive than bargain-bin PC laptops.”

As if this matters.  The iPhone would not have sold if everyone initially looked only at the iPhone price versus getting a phone &quot;for free&quot;.  This old PC vs Mac rubric implies that any users TIME HAS NO VALUE.

The end consumer knows the value of time saved, service, services, build quality, &amp; ease-of-use even though he may not verbalize it as such.  

Apple&#039;s laptops &amp; iPhone have been gaining steam like a runaway locomotive…can&#039;t stop em.

Once a uniquely great product hits the market, a purchase decision is no longer about price when we are talking 25%-50% higher price for the products that are simply better on all angles.

Consumers buy what gives them the most overall satisfaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>” Apple’s conventional notebooks are now significantly more expensive than bargain-bin PC laptops.”</p>
<p>As if this matters.  The iPhone would not have sold if everyone initially looked only at the iPhone price versus getting a phone &#8220;for free&#8221;.  This old PC vs Mac rubric implies that any users TIME HAS NO VALUE.</p>
<p>The end consumer knows the value of time saved, service, services, build quality, &amp; ease-of-use even though he may not verbalize it as such.  </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s laptops &amp; iPhone have been gaining steam like a runaway locomotive…can&#8217;t stop em.</p>
<p>Once a uniquely great product hits the market, a purchase decision is no longer about price when we are talking 25%-50% higher price for the products that are simply better on all angles.</p>
<p>Consumers buy what gives them the most overall satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChuckO</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23404</link>
		<dc:creator>ChuckO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23404</guid>
		<description>nelsonart #71, Here&#039;s something someone posted at another blog about what Ballmer said about the MS/HP &quot;slate&quot; at CES: &quot;They didn’t even really introduce a tablet. He actually said, “A prototype will be available later this year.”

Hopefully Dan&#039;s got some posts coming about CES especially the Palm announcements. That development road map looks pretty crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nelsonart #71, Here&#8217;s something someone posted at another blog about what Ballmer said about the MS/HP &#8220;slate&#8221; at CES: &#8220;They didn’t even really introduce a tablet. He actually said, “A prototype will be available later this year.”</p>
<p>Hopefully Dan&#8217;s got some posts coming about CES especially the Palm announcements. That development road map looks pretty crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefn</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2010/01/04/anticipating-the-apple-tablet/comment-page-2/#comment-23403</link>
		<dc:creator>stefn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=4044#comment-23403</guid>
		<description>Subsidy and 3G service: I see it just the other way around, the Kindle way: Add a $100 to the price and give us lifetime 3G for purchasing and downloading. Wifi for everything else. In fact, why charge $100. Amazon doesn&#039;t. It just sells and sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subsidy and 3G service: I see it just the other way around, the Kindle way: Add a $100 to the price and give us lifetime 3G for purchasing and downloading. Wifi for everything else. In fact, why charge $100. Amazon doesn&#8217;t. It just sells and sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

