Daniel Eran Dilger
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Failed terrorist attack prompts new international flight rules

Prince McLean, AppleInsider

The US Department of Homeland Security has directed the Transportation Security Administration to enact a series of heightened security measures in reaction to the failed Christmas Day terrorist attack on a plane flying from Amsterdam to Detroit.

Failed terrorist attack prompts new international flight rules
According to a report in the New York Times, international travelers bound for the United States are now being told “they could not leave their seats for the last hour of a flight, during which time they also could not use a pillow or blanket, or have anything on their laps,” including a laptop.

The new directive also requires a thorough pat-down of all passengers on international flights to the United States and a physical inspection of all their carry-on luggage prior to boarding.

All international flights are now being required to enforce new rules during the final hour of the flight which includes: insisting that all passengers remain in their seats and prohibiting passengers from accessing any carry-on baggage or from having any blankets, pillows or other personal belongings on their lap during the final hour of the flight.

The new “final hour of flight” rules appear to be in reaction to the attempts made by the Christmas Day terrorist to ignite a chemical explosive he had smuggled onto the plane. During the final hour of flight, the flight crew is most likely to be preoccupied with making preparations for landing, and least likely to be available to observe attempts to ignite such an explosive, particularly if obscured under a blanket or pillow.

Canadian officials have responded to the new directive by essentially banning all carry-on luggage for passengers headed to the United States, the Times reported.

Pay no attention to the map

Additionally, airlines’ international flights are now required to “disable aircraft-integrated passenger communications systems and services (phone, internet access services, live television programming, global positioning systems) prior to boarding and during all phases of flight.”

The directive also insists that, while over U.S. airspace, “flight crew may not make any announcement to passengers concerning flight path or position over cities or landmarks.”

The directive does nothing to prevent potential terrorist passengers from looking out the window to observe their location, and does not address the possibility that rogue passengers could obtain their own accurate position using a GPS device (such as a smartphone) that they brought onto the plane themselves.

Technology vs privacy

Efforts to flag suspect passengers and effectively and efficiently screen the general public upon boarding had been complicated by efforts to balance security with privacy concerns the Times noted in a second article on the subject.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the 23-year-old Nigerian who attempted to ignite an explosive device during the Christmas Day flight, is the son of a prominent Nigerian banker and former government official who contacted the American Embassy in October to warn them that his son had developed a radical views, had disappeared, and had a visa to enter the United States good through June of 2010.

The boy’s name was added to a list of 550,000 individuals with alleged terror connections, but was not added to the no-fly list, nor was his US visa canceled or flagged. On the other hand, there have been numerous reports of ordinary citizens and even young children being erroneously flagged for having a name similar to those on the no-fly list.

Additionally, advanced screening devices using “millimeter waves” to image a passenger’s body with sufficient resolution to detect a concealed weapon or explosive device are only being used on a small fraction of passengers. Further, due to the objections of of privacy advocates, the use of these systems has been prohibited for passengers flying to the United States.

While the House has pending legislation to prohibit all use of this equipment for routine passenger screening, Congressional leaders are also voicing outrage over the fact that a known-to-be-suspect passenger was still able to board and smuggle on an explosive device.

  • http://www.marketingtactics.com davebarnes

    “Canadian officials have responded to the new directive by essentially banning all carry-on luggage for passengers”

    So, pack your valuables in your checked luggage so the assholes in the bowels can steal them.

  • nini

    Wait, why was AI covering this at all?

  • sprockkets

    Probably because of the directive on not having electronics or laptops at the last hour of the flight.

    It is stupid due to the simple fact that nothing happened, and of course we still have to put on more restrictions on travel.

  • http://bkpfd.org qka
  • Brau

    @ qka

    That would at least keep radical Islamics from boarding or at least it “should” ;)

    Just wondering when anyone will notice their freedom and privacy is being taken away, bit by bit, not by the terrorists but by homeland control freaks, all for little more than a vague promise of security.

  • http://blog.techflaws.org Techflaws.org

    It’s all embarrassing security theater that won’t help a bit to prevent anything. Why? Read this and weep.

  • http://berendschotanus.com Berend Schotanus

    Well, these happenings inspired me to write some nasty words on my brand new blog. See: berendschotanus.com

  • Per

    Can’t they just install lasers above each seat and a guy in a control room monitoring everyone. Then he could just blast suspicious looking passengers. And if that doesn’t work, they should handcuff passengers to their seats. If they need to blow their nose, just call for the air hostess. I guesss they’ll have to resort to serving soup through straws, but hey, we all want to be secure.

  • g4dualie

    What I find egregious about this story but wasn’t included in the article is the fact that the Transportation Security Administration has no departmental leader yet because Senator Jim Demented is holding up the Administration’s candidate, with some specious argument of fear over unions!

  • http://www.tech21.de olivervoel

    This will not work: It is the attempt to solve a political problem with technology. We cannot prevent people to harm others if they are so committed that they are willing to risk their own life.
    The solution would be to find out why people attack others, and change the conditions that produce terrorists. One step in the right direction would be to redraw all armies worldwide to the country they came from.

  • harrywolf

    Radical followers of Islam:
    (A)It is the USA and UK who invaded Iraq for no good reason at all aprt from needing to grab territory and oil.
    (B) Its the USA and UK who invaded Afghanistan, for no good reason, even though NO_ONE has EVER managed to ‘win’ in Afghanistan.
    (C) Its the USA an UK governments who are introducing draconian laws and taking away our ‘freedoms’.
    (D) Its still not proven if any ‘terrorist’ has EVER managed to do anything at all in the USA. 911 has never been investigated at all, and the likelihood is that it was perpetrated by the US govt.

    When the HELL are people going to wake up, switch of the damn TV and start thinking?

    How about we get out of the middle east, stop supporting Israel and simply work hard, do good, trade with other countries and stop being so fat lazy and greedy…..

  • maxijazz@poczta.fm

    I was “victim” of new TSA rules during this Christmas return to home and i must say this is aggravated violence of privacy. Hard to say if it is sad or laughable, but i was searched (as well as other flight comrades) and still could have a bomb (big word here for honest guy like me) ie in my photo zoom. All this looked more like demonstration of power then efficient way of finding anything, but “illegal bottle of herbs”.