<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:23:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SunnyGuy53</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22435</link>
		<dc:creator>SunnyGuy53</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22435</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about Family Guy or Microsoft -- I only skimmed the article -- but I so like the RDM commentary, that I read those. :-)

My pet peeve is why do websites suddenly require one to enter ones email address twice? It made sense in the case of setting passwords, because they&#039;re not echoed, and so a typo would not be apparent.

This is not the case with email addresses. I simply type it once, and then cut and paste it. What sense does that make? Can someone please explain?

Anyway, keep up the good work, Daniel!

Sunny Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about Family Guy or Microsoft &#8212; I only skimmed the article &#8212; but I so like the RDM commentary, that I read those. :-)</p>
<p>My pet peeve is why do websites suddenly require one to enter ones email address twice? It made sense in the case of setting passwords, because they&#8217;re not echoed, and so a typo would not be apparent.</p>
<p>This is not the case with email addresses. I simply type it once, and then cut and paste it. What sense does that make? Can someone please explain?</p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the good work, Daniel!</p>
<p>Sunny Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues &#8230; Admin China</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22217</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues &#8230; Admin China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22217</guid>
		<description>[...] from: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues &#8230;          By admin &#124; category: family guy &#124; tags: apple, campaign-featuring, family guy, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues &#8230;          By admin | category: family guy | tags: apple, campaign-featuring, family guy, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paolo</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22089</link>
		<dc:creator>paolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that this stuff is amateurish, at best.
Also, I can&#039;t understand how these people fail to have a &#039;vision&#039; for their product. They seem to think: let&#039;s throw money at an ad campaign, something good will surely happen. No target audience, no &#039;soul&#039; in their product, and a very bad execution at it. wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that this stuff is amateurish, at best.<br />
Also, I can&#8217;t understand how these people fail to have a &#8216;vision&#8217; for their product. They seem to think: let&#8217;s throw money at an ad campaign, something good will surely happen. No target audience, no &#8217;soul&#8217; in their product, and a very bad execution at it. wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22088</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22088</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by DanielEran: New: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues - http://tinyurl.com/ykebhar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by DanielEran: New: Microsoft drops Family Guy special over content issues &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ykebhar.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ykebhar..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x23</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22086</link>
		<dc:creator>x23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22086</guid>
		<description>there were also the Ricky Gervais / Stephen Merchant (Gervais is in the UK Office David Brent character) Microsoft UK training videos.

i found them amusing enough. 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=oKyV-l8i5lg

that is the first part... it is divided into 4 chunks on YouTube it appears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there were also the Ricky Gervais / Stephen Merchant (Gervais is in the UK Office David Brent character) Microsoft UK training videos.</p>
<p>i found them amusing enough. </p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=oKyV-l8i5lg" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=oKyV-l8i5lg</a></p>
<p>that is the first part&#8230; it is divided into 4 chunks on YouTube it appears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studiodave</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22083</link>
		<dc:creator>studiodave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22083</guid>
		<description>With a billion people contributing to Windows 7 the thought comes to mind,

Too many cooks spoil the broth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a billion people contributing to Windows 7 the thought comes to mind,</p>
<p>Too many cooks spoil the broth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nini</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/10/27/microsoft-drops-family-guy-special-over-content-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-22068</link>
		<dc:creator>nini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3916#comment-22068</guid>
		<description>I have two words. Duh. Duh and really? Like everyone else has asked, did anyone at Microsoft ever watch Family Guy before putting the idea forward?

Guess I&#039;m still pretty shocked and partially angered by Gates&#039; advertainment appearance on Frasier which I was either entirely unaware of or repressed away. Seems to me that this coupled with a terrible ad campaign for Windows 7 here in the UK (incredibly dickish guy stating he made Win7, he can keep that badge of honour) is yet more proof Microsoft can&#039;t advertise their own OS worth a damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two words. Duh. Duh and really? Like everyone else has asked, did anyone at Microsoft ever watch Family Guy before putting the idea forward?</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;m still pretty shocked and partially angered by Gates&#8217; advertainment appearance on Frasier which I was either entirely unaware of or repressed away. Seems to me that this coupled with a terrible ad campaign for Windows 7 here in the UK (incredibly dickish guy stating he made Win7, he can keep that badge of honour) is yet more proof Microsoft can&#8217;t advertise their own OS worth a damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
