<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple keeps iPhone specifications quiet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:15:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: daGUY</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19168</link>
		<dc:creator>daGUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3582#comment-19168</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I think Apple would prefer to not publish the specs of its computers either, if there weren&#039;t already a precedent and expectation for that in the industry.

The ONLY spec that most regular users ever need to be specifically concerned with is hard drive capacity, as that tells them how much information they can fit on their phone/MP3 player/PC (and note how Apple does very clearly promote this with the iPhone/Touch).

Other than that, there are so many factors that affect the speed (or perception of speed) that minor differences in specific specs are pretty irrelevant, and just end up serving as the basis of false comparisons. For instance, a machine with a 2.16 GHz processor isn&#039;t necessarily faster than one with a 2.0 GHz chip - the &quot;slower&quot; machine may have more/faster RAM, more/faster video memory, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I think Apple would prefer to not publish the specs of its computers either, if there weren&#8217;t already a precedent and expectation for that in the industry.</p>
<p>The ONLY spec that most regular users ever need to be specifically concerned with is hard drive capacity, as that tells them how much information they can fit on their phone/MP3 player/PC (and note how Apple does very clearly promote this with the iPhone/Touch).</p>
<p>Other than that, there are so many factors that affect the speed (or perception of speed) that minor differences in specific specs are pretty irrelevant, and just end up serving as the basis of false comparisons. For instance, a machine with a 2.16 GHz processor isn&#8217;t necessarily faster than one with a 2.0 GHz chip &#8211; the &#8220;slower&#8221; machine may have more/faster RAM, more/faster video memory, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonlocal</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19120</link>
		<dc:creator>nonlocal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3582#comment-19120</guid>
		<description>Not publishing anything authoritative about the device seems to lead to folks making wild guesses (c.f. the completely wrong assertions made about the original iPhone SoC being the S3C6400 and the current SoC being the S5PC100) which are then picked up by the press and repeated as gospel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not publishing anything authoritative about the device seems to lead to folks making wild guesses (c.f. the completely wrong assertions made about the original iPhone SoC being the S3C6400 and the current SoC being the S5PC100) which are then picked up by the press and repeated as gospel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studiodave</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19055</link>
		<dc:creator>studiodave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3582#comment-19055</guid>
		<description>Because people will read something into it that doesn&#039;t really matter. I remember reading in the past that PC was 2 GHz while the Mac was only 1.4 GHz and people believed that made the PC faster, SO WRONG.
Why give those that don&#039;t understand the whole picture info that will allow them to make the wrong choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because people will read something into it that doesn&#8217;t really matter. I remember reading in the past that PC was 2 GHz while the Mac was only 1.4 GHz and people believed that made the PC faster, SO WRONG.<br />
Why give those that don&#8217;t understand the whole picture info that will allow them to make the wrong choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VeoSotano</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19052</link>
		<dc:creator>VeoSotano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3582#comment-19052</guid>
		<description>But why keep it secret? While I understand that the numbers are not the focus of the marketing efforts, and rightly so, I don&#039;t get why they don&#039;t just mention it as a sidenote... Most people are actually interested in those numbers. It would give them a greater feeling of transparency, which is at what Apple is failing the most, right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why keep it secret? While I understand that the numbers are not the focus of the marketing efforts, and rightly so, I don&#8217;t get why they don&#8217;t just mention it as a sidenote&#8230; Most people are actually interested in those numbers. It would give them a greater feeling of transparency, which is at what Apple is failing the most, right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studiodave</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/06/11/why-apple-keeps-iphone-specifications-quiet-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19047</link>
		<dc:creator>studiodave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3582#comment-19047</guid>
		<description>This is so true. I could care less if my iPhone runs at what ever speed it runs at. When I turn it on and make a call or play a game or use GPS and it works that&#039;s all that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true. I could care less if my iPhone runs at what ever speed it runs at. When I turn it on and make a call or play a game or use GPS and it works that&#8217;s all that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
