<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next-gen iPod touch, iPhone to support low-power 802.11n</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 &#8212; What I Would Buy</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/comment-page-1/#comment-18414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bites from the Apple: Closer to iPhone 3.0 &#8212; What I Would Buy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3442#comment-18414</guid>
		<description>[...] by James &#183; 0 comments   The closer we get to June, the louder the buzz is becoming about the likelihood that we&#8217;ll be seeing new iPhone hardware to go along with the iPhone 3.0 software. The IntoMobile blog (among others) has been speculating that there will be two iPhones, and this week a Kaufman Bros. analyst increased that speculation based on reports from supply chain and industry sources. Fortune&#8217;s Apple 2.0 blog covers his findings, which include one iPhone with a more powerful processor and longer battery life as well as the possibility that AT&amp;T will offer more price-flexible data plans. In regards to the process/battery angle, Cult of Mac reports that code for the iPhone 3.0 software indicates support for the 802.11n wireless standard, which could improve battery life. (My pal Glenn Fleishman considered this possibility back in late March, and came to the conclusion that the iPhone would benefit from 802.11n Wi-Fi, but the processor would also need to be improved. Also check out some more technical details about the advantages of 802.11n from Roughly Drafted.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by James &middot; 0 comments   The closer we get to June, the louder the buzz is becoming about the likelihood that we&#8217;ll be seeing new iPhone hardware to go along with the iPhone 3.0 software. The IntoMobile blog (among others) has been speculating that there will be two iPhones, and this week a Kaufman Bros. analyst increased that speculation based on reports from supply chain and industry sources. Fortune&#8217;s Apple 2.0 blog covers his findings, which include one iPhone with a more powerful processor and longer battery life as well as the possibility that AT&amp;T will offer more price-flexible data plans. In regards to the process/battery angle, Cult of Mac reports that code for the iPhone 3.0 software indicates support for the 802.11n wireless standard, which could improve battery life. (My pal Glenn Fleishman considered this possibility back in late March, and came to the conclusion that the iPhone would benefit from 802.11n Wi-Fi, but the processor would also need to be improved. Also check out some more technical details about the advantages of 802.11n from Roughly Drafted.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enzos</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/comment-page-1/#comment-18330</link>
		<dc:creator>enzos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3442#comment-18330</guid>
		<description>@Dan.. could be trouble brewing for Wi-Fi users from my old mates at CSIRO... http://www.itwire.com/content/view/24224/1023/  

&gt;&gt;CSIRO Takes HP to Cleaners Over Wi-Fi Patent - Next!	 
by Stan Beer	   
Friday, 03 April 2009
The largest IT company in the world, Hewlett-Packard, has been humbled by Australia&#039;s national science agency CSIRO and agreed to settle for an undisclosed sum over a long running Wi-Fi patent infringement suit. The win against the Silicon Valley colossus has given CSIRO ammunition to continue pursuing 13 other technology giants for millions of dollars in licensing fees. ...&lt;&lt;

Any insights on this re Apple, Dan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan.. could be trouble brewing for Wi-Fi users from my old mates at CSIRO&#8230; <a href="http://www.itwire.com/content/view/24224/1023/" rel="nofollow">http://www.itwire.com/content/view/24224/1023/</a>  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;CSIRO Takes HP to Cleaners Over Wi-Fi Patent &#8211; Next!<br />
by Stan Beer<br />
Friday, 03 April 2009<br />
The largest IT company in the world, Hewlett-Packard, has been humbled by Australia&#8217;s national science agency CSIRO and agreed to settle for an undisclosed sum over a long running Wi-Fi patent infringement suit. The win against the Silicon Valley colossus has given CSIRO ammunition to continue pursuing 13 other technology giants for millions of dollars in licensing fees. &#8230;&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Any insights on this re Apple, Dan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greendave</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/comment-page-1/#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>greendave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3442#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>Cool.  But this will leave me even more annoyed that I have to carry my old phone (SE K800i) as a radio in the morning because I don&#039;t have an FM radio in my iPhone - despite the fact the BCM4329 has an FM radio receiver.  BTW, FM transmitter is also mentioned - could this be used to link to a car stereo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  But this will leave me even more annoyed that I have to carry my old phone (SE K800i) as a radio in the morning because I don&#8217;t have an FM radio in my iPhone &#8211; despite the fact the BCM4329 has an FM radio receiver.  BTW, FM transmitter is also mentioned &#8211; could this be used to link to a car stereo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next-gen iPod touch, iPhone to support low-power 802.11n</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/04/04/next-gen-ipod-touch-iphone-to-support-low-power-80211n/comment-page-1/#comment-18288</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next-gen iPod touch, iPhone to support low-power 802.11n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 06:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3442#comment-18288</guid>
		<description>[...] Prince McLean, AppleInsider Wireless radio component specifications contained within beta distributions of iPhone 3.0 firmware reveal support for a new chip enabling low power 802.11n that&#8217;s bound for Apple&#8217;s third-generation iPod touch. It&#8217;s therefore also likely to be included with new iPhone models. Next-gen iPod touch, iPhone to support low-power 802.11n The version of the existing Broadcom chip [...]  Go to Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prince McLean, AppleInsider Wireless radio component specifications contained within beta distributions of iPhone 3.0 firmware reveal support for a new chip enabling low power 802.11n that&#8217;s bound for Apple&#8217;s third-generation iPod touch. It&#8217;s therefore also likely to be included with new iPhone models. Next-gen iPod touch, iPhone to support low-power 802.11n The version of the existing Broadcom chip [...]  Go to Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

