<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: What&#8217;s new in iPhone 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: enzos</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-18253</link>
		<dc:creator>enzos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3039#comment-18253</guid>
		<description>You were OK, Dan.. but who was that self-regarding twat who came on before you? (Yeah, I know, but I&#039;m not going to cue it up again to find out.)
-Enz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were OK, Dan.. but who was that self-regarding twat who came on before you? (Yeah, I know, but I&#8217;m not going to cue it up again to find out.)<br />
-Enz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Per</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-16811</link>
		<dc:creator>Per</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3039#comment-16811</guid>
		<description>This podcast is really cheesy, Daniel. May I suggest going on MacBreak Weekly instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This podcast is really cheesy, Daniel. May I suggest going on MacBreak Weekly instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast: Apple’s last stand at Macworld Expo — RoughlyDrafted Magazine&#160;&#124;&#160;:: superiphoneblog</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-16771</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast: Apple’s last stand at Macworld Expo — RoughlyDrafted Magazine&#160;&#124;&#160;:: superiphoneblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3039#comment-16771</guid>
		<description>[...] more from the example source:  Podcast: Apple’s terminal defence at Macworld Expo — RoughlyDrafted Magazine  history, iphone app, itunes, journal, leopard, macworld-expo, markets, media, microsoft, music, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more from the example source:  Podcast: Apple’s terminal defence at Macworld Expo — RoughlyDrafted Magazine  history, iphone app, itunes, journal, leopard, macworld-expo, markets, media, microsoft, music, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nat</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/29/podcast-whats-new-in-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-16753</link>
		<dc:creator>nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3039#comment-16753</guid>
		<description>Gotta be honest, first Tech Night Owl podcast I didn&#039;t like.  Maybe that&#039;s not saying much considering I only listen when Dan&#039;s on, but I found the host to be rather crass, especially regarding Jobs.  Steinberg basically took on the gripes of his earlier guests - no more Macworld keynotes/no 25th Mac anniversary parade, and the iTunes Store&#039;s all-or-nothing upgrade process - as his own with little consideration.  

Sheesh, how long have people bitched and moaned about iTunes&#039; rather lax DRM!?  Now Apple&#039;s gotten the Big 4 to &lt;i&gt;finally&lt;/i&gt; give up their shenanigans and...&lt;i&gt;whaa, I&#039;m not spending my money to upgrade all my music!!&lt;/i&gt;  Wasn&#039;t it always the case that on average, iPods only had like 5 to 10 iTS-bought songs, while the rest were ripped from CDs or obtained by other means?  Who&#039;s being forced to upgrade at all?

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m not crazy about it either, but it&#039;s really not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; bad.  Most consumers have no clue their music is FairPlay encoded, nor do most have good enough headphones to notice the difference in sound quality.  Maybe when all songs go DRM-free in March, they&#039;ll change the process.  What if a ton of back catalog songs go down to $0.69?  Wouldn&#039;t it be nice to possibly upgrade for even less than $0.30/song?

As for the 25th anniversary of the Mac, uh, it hasn&#039;t arrived yet!  Daniel, you brought up a good point: why not say something about it when they have more Macs to unveil, i.e., at their inevitable iMac/Mac Mini event?  Or at Snow Leopard&#039;s public demo (if it&#039;s separate from the desktop announcements)?

All this of course is Jobs&#039; fault/evil doings according to the host and thus he must pay for it while recuperating on his imagined hospital bed.  &lt;i&gt;Classy!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta be honest, first Tech Night Owl podcast I didn&#8217;t like.  Maybe that&#8217;s not saying much considering I only listen when Dan&#8217;s on, but I found the host to be rather crass, especially regarding Jobs.  Steinberg basically took on the gripes of his earlier guests &#8211; no more Macworld keynotes/no 25th Mac anniversary parade, and the iTunes Store&#8217;s all-or-nothing upgrade process &#8211; as his own with little consideration.  </p>
<p>Sheesh, how long have people bitched and moaned about iTunes&#8217; rather lax DRM!?  Now Apple&#8217;s gotten the Big 4 to <i>finally</i> give up their shenanigans and&#8230;<i>whaa, I&#8217;m not spending my money to upgrade all my music!!</i>  Wasn&#8217;t it always the case that on average, iPods only had like 5 to 10 iTS-bought songs, while the rest were ripped from CDs or obtained by other means?  Who&#8217;s being forced to upgrade at all?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not crazy about it either, but it&#8217;s really not <i>that</i> bad.  Most consumers have no clue their music is FairPlay encoded, nor do most have good enough headphones to notice the difference in sound quality.  Maybe when all songs go DRM-free in March, they&#8217;ll change the process.  What if a ton of back catalog songs go down to $0.69?  Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice to possibly upgrade for even less than $0.30/song?</p>
<p>As for the 25th anniversary of the Mac, uh, it hasn&#8217;t arrived yet!  Daniel, you brought up a good point: why not say something about it when they have more Macs to unveil, i.e., at their inevitable iMac/Mac Mini event?  Or at Snow Leopard&#8217;s public demo (if it&#8217;s separate from the desktop announcements)?</p>
<p>All this of course is Jobs&#8217; fault/evil doings according to the host and thus he must pay for it while recuperating on his imagined hospital bed.  <i>Classy!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

