<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s anti-Mac pricing campaign takes to the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: enzos</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18255</link>
		<dc:creator>enzos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18255</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a gamble for M$. Think about it: for the ad to be successful it has to influence more than nine out of ten buyers that cheap is more important than quality, otherwise the ad will increase Mac sales (at 10% of market) by drawing attention to the platform. I could imagine two out three or even four out of five Americans thinking like the ranga (cheapskates) - but not nine out of ten!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a gamble for M$. Think about it: for the ad to be successful it has to influence more than nine out of ten buyers that cheap is more important than quality, otherwise the ad will increase Mac sales (at 10% of market) by drawing attention to the platform. I could imagine two out three or even four out of five Americans thinking like the ranga (cheapskates) &#8211; but not nine out of ten!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXT</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18239</link>
		<dc:creator>PXT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18239</guid>
		<description>One thing the ad&#039;s images did get right is that the Mac has reached its user desktop while the PC is still starting up !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing the ad&#8217;s images did get right is that the Mac has reached its user desktop while the PC is still starting up !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beetle</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18236</link>
		<dc:creator>beetle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18236</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a direct link to the ad with a live “Spin Again” button?  NY Times seems to have dropped it, and I cannot find it on the µ$ site…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a direct link to the ad with a live “Spin Again” button?  NY Times seems to have dropped it, and I cannot find it on the µ$ site…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osp</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18234</link>
		<dc:creator>osp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18234</guid>
		<description>Hello Daniel,

wonderful comment :-)
Isn&#039;t it great, Microsoft positions itself at the very low cost market segment. Microsoft doesn&#039;t associate itself with quality. At least they are honest. That leaves a lot of potential switchers for Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Daniel,</p>
<p>wonderful comment :-)<br />
Isn&#8217;t it great, Microsoft positions itself at the very low cost market segment. Microsoft doesn&#8217;t associate itself with quality. At least they are honest. That leaves a lot of potential switchers for Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18208</link>
		<dc:creator>qka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18208</guid>
		<description>&quot;Macs ... also offer personalized support in Apple’s retail stores, which is free to those who don’t mind standing around waiting for an available genius&quot;

Or are smart enough to go on the web an make an appointment. I never go to the Apple Store expecting to just walk in and talk to a genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Macs &#8230; also offer personalized support in Apple’s retail stores, which is free to those who don’t mind standing around waiting for an available genius&#8221;</p>
<p>Or are smart enough to go on the web an make an appointment. I never go to the Apple Store expecting to just walk in and talk to a genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpaterso</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18206</link>
		<dc:creator>dpaterso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18206</guid>
		<description>GNU/Linux deserves more than a sentence in this discussion.  It seems Microsoft is making an argument that favours something like Ubuntu OS which I believe is a perfectly satisfactory computing experience for many who have never heard of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNU/Linux deserves more than a sentence in this discussion.  It seems Microsoft is making an argument that favours something like Ubuntu OS which I believe is a perfectly satisfactory computing experience for many who have never heard of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iDarbert</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18202</link>
		<dc:creator>iDarbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18202</guid>
		<description>This ad targets the typical mentality of the average consumer.
Most people don&#039;t care about the quality of their purchases or the TCO, they believe that if they spend less to make the purchase it&#039;s a better deal, and if they are able to the specs.

As for the ad itself, I don&#039;t think it does anything; while Apple ads somehow try to break popular beliefs about the Mac (believe it or not some people still think there is no Microsfot Office for Mac - but that&#039;s nothing: somebody actually asked me if my Mac was able to display jpegs) Microsoft ads seem to focus on telling people what they already know: Macs are more expensive.

The ad fails in so many ways it&#039;s not even funny: for example nowhere in the campaign is the message that Macs are overpriced (which is what many people believe), it&#039;s just stated that they are more expensive.
One could say it&#039;s a clever way to exploit the current state of the economy but I think it&#039;s more of a miss.

Another problem with the compaign is that while the phrase &quot;I&#039;m not cool enough to be a Mac person&quot; (a actress is not cool enough, seriously?) the campaign is also implying that Macs are cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ad targets the typical mentality of the average consumer.<br />
Most people don&#8217;t care about the quality of their purchases or the TCO, they believe that if they spend less to make the purchase it&#8217;s a better deal, and if they are able to the specs.</p>
<p>As for the ad itself, I don&#8217;t think it does anything; while Apple ads somehow try to break popular beliefs about the Mac (believe it or not some people still think there is no Microsfot Office for Mac &#8211; but that&#8217;s nothing: somebody actually asked me if my Mac was able to display jpegs) Microsoft ads seem to focus on telling people what they already know: Macs are more expensive.</p>
<p>The ad fails in so many ways it&#8217;s not even funny: for example nowhere in the campaign is the message that Macs are overpriced (which is what many people believe), it&#8217;s just stated that they are more expensive.<br />
One could say it&#8217;s a clever way to exploit the current state of the economy but I think it&#8217;s more of a miss.</p>
<p>Another problem with the compaign is that while the phrase &#8220;I&#8217;m not cool enough to be a Mac person&#8221; (a actress is not cool enough, seriously?) the campaign is also implying that Macs are cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamk359</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18199</link>
		<dc:creator>adamk359</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18199</guid>
		<description>This pretty much sums up my beliefs about the two OS&#039;s. The more bloated and useless Windows becomes, the more expensive it is. OS X, on the other hand, remains at the same price every time and evolves and brings in new technologies rather than Microsoft&#039;s way of creating hackneyed solutions to problems plaguing Windows for ages and labeling them as new technologies. OS X and Macs come with simple, useful &quot;lifestyle&quot; software unlike Windows that ships with half-baked software solutions that try to do the same things.

Lots of Windows fanboys have said that with Macs you have to upgrade every time they come out with a new model and that costs big bucks. The so-called &quot;Apple Tax&quot;. It&#039;s just not true though. I can keep my mid-2007 second gen MacBook and just upgrade the software till my MacBook is no longer supported...and I have a feeling that will be many years from now. With Windows it&#039;s almost the exact opposite. You bought a cheap Windows PC with XP a few years ago...but it&#039;s not exactly guaranteed to be able to run Vista. It may run Windows 7 due to code/bloat slimming, but even that has steep requirements to get the full &quot;experience&quot;. The truth is is that the real tax is coming from Microsoft. It&#039;s like a promotion though: Build a cheap PC and get a bloated, useless operating system for $300! Plays games too! Woot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This pretty much sums up my beliefs about the two OS&#8217;s. The more bloated and useless Windows becomes, the more expensive it is. OS X, on the other hand, remains at the same price every time and evolves and brings in new technologies rather than Microsoft&#8217;s way of creating hackneyed solutions to problems plaguing Windows for ages and labeling them as new technologies. OS X and Macs come with simple, useful &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; software unlike Windows that ships with half-baked software solutions that try to do the same things.</p>
<p>Lots of Windows fanboys have said that with Macs you have to upgrade every time they come out with a new model and that costs big bucks. The so-called &#8220;Apple Tax&#8221;. It&#8217;s just not true though. I can keep my mid-2007 second gen MacBook and just upgrade the software till my MacBook is no longer supported&#8230;and I have a feeling that will be many years from now. With Windows it&#8217;s almost the exact opposite. You bought a cheap Windows PC with XP a few years ago&#8230;but it&#8217;s not exactly guaranteed to be able to run Vista. It may run Windows 7 due to code/bloat slimming, but even that has steep requirements to get the full &#8220;experience&#8221;. The truth is is that the real tax is coming from Microsoft. It&#8217;s like a promotion though: Build a cheap PC and get a bloated, useless operating system for $300! Plays games too! Woot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft’s anti-Mac pricing campaign takes to the web &#8230; &#124; Microsoft Software OEM</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18195</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft’s anti-Mac pricing campaign takes to the web &#8230; &#124; Microsoft Software OEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18195</guid>
		<description>[...] See original here: Microsoft’s anti-Mac pricing campaign takes to the web &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See original here: Microsoft’s anti-Mac pricing campaign takes to the web &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXT</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-anti-mac-pricing-campaign-takes-to-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-18192</link>
		<dc:creator>PXT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3419#comment-18192</guid>
		<description>People that perceive the value of Macs will not be affected by this advertising. Furthermore, Apple benefits by people becoming curious about Macs, which this Microsoft ad inadvertently achieves for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People that perceive the value of Macs will not be affected by this advertising. Furthermore, Apple benefits by people becoming curious about Macs, which this Microsoft ad inadvertently achieves for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

