<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone graphics may get multiprocessor performance upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/18/iphone-graphics-may-get-multiprocessor-performance-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/18/iphone-graphics-may-get-multiprocessor-performance-upgrade/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: droughtquake</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/18/iphone-graphics-may-get-multiprocessor-performance-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-17902</link>
		<dc:creator>droughtquake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3340#comment-17902</guid>
		<description>Could Apple possibly use future versions of the chips in MacBook &amp; mini replacements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Apple possibly use future versions of the chips in MacBook &amp; mini replacements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrictNon-Conformist</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/18/iphone-graphics-may-get-multiprocessor-performance-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-17898</link>
		<dc:creator>StrictNon-Conformist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3340#comment-17898</guid>
		<description>This development is of greatest value to Apple only if they can exercise enough influence somehow to keep Imagination from selling their multicore tile processing to other mobile manufacturers: while Apple would seem to have a huge advantage with the upcoming OS X changes to take advantage of such hardware via a nice API, if there&#039;s enough interest in such capabilities for other phones, other manufacturers will be all over SMP GP-GPU hardware on phones, too.  Of course, just having hardware tech isn&#039;t enough: the software infrastructure/platform needs to be executed properly, too, in terms of it being solid software, and also in getting developers to sign on and actually use it: this is what Apple has going for it the most with the iPhone OS, is that as of now, there&#039;s around 30 million almost identical devices using it, making a large easy to hit target, especially including the development tools available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This development is of greatest value to Apple only if they can exercise enough influence somehow to keep Imagination from selling their multicore tile processing to other mobile manufacturers: while Apple would seem to have a huge advantage with the upcoming OS X changes to take advantage of such hardware via a nice API, if there&#8217;s enough interest in such capabilities for other phones, other manufacturers will be all over SMP GP-GPU hardware on phones, too.  Of course, just having hardware tech isn&#8217;t enough: the software infrastructure/platform needs to be executed properly, too, in terms of it being solid software, and also in getting developers to sign on and actually use it: this is what Apple has going for it the most with the iPhone OS, is that as of now, there&#8217;s around 30 million almost identical devices using it, making a large easy to hit target, especially including the development tools available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

