<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USB 3 test spec to be in Apple&#8217;s hands by June</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LinuxThis</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/comment-page-1/#comment-20263</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3287#comment-20263</guid>
		<description>This is what really pissed me off when I bought my first mac, an imac that only had usb 1.1, when every computer being sold had usb 2, apple never mentioned that on their site which I bought directly from, what a waste of $2000. I felt like shit after that. And their bluetooth which I had to pay for was only 1.2 and not up-datable. F-ck&#039;n thanks apple piss. I guess it is only Linux for me for now on.

&lt;em&gt;[How does Linux solve hardware issues? Apple did initially bet on FireWire rather than USB 2.0, but there was never a coverup or hiding of the fact that Macs at the time were shipping with the original USB 1.1 ports. - Dan]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what really pissed me off when I bought my first mac, an imac that only had usb 1.1, when every computer being sold had usb 2, apple never mentioned that on their site which I bought directly from, what a waste of $2000. I felt like shit after that. And their bluetooth which I had to pay for was only 1.2 and not up-datable. F-ck&#8217;n thanks apple piss. I guess it is only Linux for me for now on.</p>
<p><em>[How does Linux solve hardware issues? Apple did initially bet on FireWire rather than USB 2.0, but there was never a coverup or hiding of the fact that Macs at the time were shipping with the original USB 1.1 ports. - Dan]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: droughtquake</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/comment-page-1/#comment-17803</link>
		<dc:creator>droughtquake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3287#comment-17803</guid>
		<description>Are you sure you&#039;re not co-authoring this article with Zak Spears?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure you&#8217;re not co-authoring this article with Zak Spears?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qka</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/comment-page-1/#comment-17794</link>
		<dc:creator>qka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3287#comment-17794</guid>
		<description>This article was posted on Tuesday, 3/10, but did not show up in the RSS feed until late in the day Friday, 3/13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was posted on Tuesday, 3/10, but did not show up in the RSS feed until late in the day Friday, 3/13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCS</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/03/10/usb-3-test-spec-to-be-in-apples-hands-by-june/comment-page-1/#comment-17791</link>
		<dc:creator>CCS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3287#comment-17791</guid>
		<description>I was hoping USB3 would offer a tad more intelligence. Just a speed bump, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping USB3 would offer a tad more intelligence. Just a speed bump, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

