Daniel Eran Dilger
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Exploring Windows 7 on the Mac: the Taskbar

 Win7Task-090206-5
Prince McLean, AppleInsider
Once past the fairly painless installation of the Windows 7 beta, Mac users will be struck with deja vu. This new version of Windows looks more like Mac OS X than any previous edition ever offered by Microsoft.

Exploring Windows 7 for Mac users
Exploring Windows 7 on the Mac: installation via Boot Camp
Exploring Windows 7 on the Mac: the Taskbar
.

Mac users will feel more at home than ever whether running Windows 7 in a virtual environment, using Boot Camp, or running the system on a generic PC. Less translation between Windows and the Mac desktop means less frustration and fewer interruptions. This segment looks at some of the strongest similarities that debut in Windows 7, starting with the new Taskbar.

The ultra new Taskbar

The new Taskbar in Windows 7 is so greatly improved that Microsoft’s more vocal proponents have begun calling it the Ultrabar, just as Apple fans began calling the new Dock in Leopard the UltraDock.

Actually that never happened. Mac users only complained that the new Leopard Dock in beta, when slid to the vertical side, depicted apps being suspended without any apparent gravity, and insisted Apple correct this problem.

The ultra new Taskbar in the Windows 7 beta is distinguished from previous editions of Windows in that it now shows one icon per application (below), rather than a series of bars that either represented each window on screen, or in some cases an application with many windows open. Mac users will appreciate this more sensible, consistent, and familiar approach Microsoft has taken as they work between the two environments.

Windows 7 beta:

Windows 7 Taskbar
Windows Vista:
Windows 7 Taskbar
Windows XP:
Windows 7 Taskbar
One size fits all

There are still some differences between the Taskbar and the Mac OS X Dock: the Windows 7 version (which may yet still change before its release) must be manually “unlocked” before resizing it, and then can only be resized in half inch-sized increments.

Even so, resizing the Taskbar neither resizes the icons (as it would in Mac OS X) nor provides more vertical room for organizing Taskbar items (as Windows users might expect). You can’t organize icons in vertical rows, making it fairly useless to change the vertical height of the Taskbar. There’s also no Dock-like magnification.

Taskbar app icons sit within a metallic looking panel which becomes glass-like blocks that highlight when the app is active in the foreground or running. The early betas of Mac OS X in 2000 similarly lacked both a transparent background and smooth vector scaling (below, Mac OS X DP3).

Windows 7 Taskbar
Patented Dock features

Windows 7 won’t ever look entirely like the Mac’s Dock because Apple successfully applied for a patent on the Dock back in 1999; it was granted last October. The patent makes specific claims related to magnification, auto resizing as new icons are added, auto-hide, rollover text labels, user reorganizing of the icons, and other specific features developed by Apple, in contrast to the prior art citec in the patent filing (below).

To protect its claims, Apple even asked Google to stop hosting an experimental Dock-like interface online. Apple’s patent shouldn’t prevent Microsoft from using its new Dock-like Taskbar entirely, but it does limit what features Microsoft can copy. Having said that, some features, such as the Dock’s zooming magnification effect, are far more fun than they are useful, resulting in many users turning it off after the novelty subsides.

Other aspects of Apple’s patent may be hard to enforce, but it appears Microsoft is treading lightly in its implementation. Apple was only granted its Dock patent four months ago, so Microsoft may also not have been aware of it during the development of the current Windows 7 beta Taskbar.

Windows 7 Taskbar
The road to today’s Dock

Microsoft’s essential adoption of the Mac OS X Dock results in a desktop that looks and in some cases behaves more like the Mac than Windows ever has since 1995, a definite plus for Mac users who might need to switch between the two environments.

Despite the patent covering specific features, neither Apple nor Microsoft can claim having invented the general Dock concept itself. Apple’s original 1984 Mac had no need for a Dock because it could only run one application at a time. As the Classic Mac OS gained the ability to run multiple apps on screen at once, Apple toyed with different interface add-ons that handled app launching and window management, but the Dock as we know it developed outside of Apple.

A number of Apple employees joined Steve Jobs’ NeXT after he left Apple in 1986. That company created an early Dock for the NeXTSTEP operating system that represented each running application with a block, which could be rearranged along the sides of the display. Blocks could also update themselves to provide status updates. NeXT patented that design in 1992 as an invention credited to Jean-Marie Hullot, Steve Jobs, and Christopher Franklin.

Other graphical desktops in the late 80s had also used a Dock-like shortcut bar for launching apps, including Acorn’s UK equivalent to the Mac, the 1987 Archimedes. In the early 90s, Apple itself used a Dock-like launcher in the Newton OS for its Message Pad PDAs. NeXT’s patent covered specific inventions related to its Dock, which were unique over the button bars commonly used in many places.

By 1995 Microsoft had consolidated control over the desktop PC. Rather than including a Dock-like interface in its new Windows 95, Microsoft chose its own path with the new Taskbar, resulting in a fifteen year lapse of Dock-goodness on mainstream PCs.

Different to be different

The Windows 95 Taskbar (below) displayed a long rectangle for each task running on the desktop, resulting in a more obvious indicator of the number of applications and windows that were active compared to the standard System 7 desktop on the Mac, but quickly becoming illegible as the Taskbar filled up with rectangles.

Windows 7 Taskbar
Windows 7 Taskbar
Microsoft had also started charting its own course in other areas of the graphical user interface. Rather than following Apple’s Human Interface Guidelines, which had a decade earlier codified a document-centric view of the computing desktop, Microsoft adopted the MDI (multiple document interface) windowing system.

Rather than using a central menu bar reflecting the current application and putting individual documents each in their own window, MDI puts an application’s menus and toolbar on a floating window, and embeds each of its open documents in a window within that window (below). For the Taskbar, this meant that a rectangle-represented task could be a document in an application, or could be an application with multiple documents.

Windows 7 Taskbar
The waters muddied as Microsoft began breaking its own conventions, first by making some apps behave more like Mac apps, (such as Word, where each document became a free standing window), while leaving other apps as MDI (such as Excel, which retains the embedded document windows idea), while also embracing tabbed windows, which incorporate multiple documents into a single shared window without any window nestling.

The Taskbar initially served only to select between running tasks, but Microsoft then added a Quick Launch area where users could drag app icons for easy startup. This handy feature was actually turned off by default in Windows XP, making a trip through the Start Menu necessary for launching new apps.

Return of the Dock

In Mac OS X, Apple adopted the NeXT Dock as a replacement for a number of interface conventions that had been bolted on to the Classic Mac OS over the years, including the Control Strip, the Application Menu, and the Launcher, as described in the Road to Mac OS X Leopard: Dock 1.6.

Mac OS X’s new Dock not only handled all of those functions, but also served as a way to quickly highlight what apps were open, as well as acting as place to dock minimized windows and frequently opened documents, among the other features Apple patented.

To show off the new system’s advanced graphics compositing engine, Apple also added transparency around the icons in the Dock, vector scaling for resizing the Dock’s icons to any size, a smooth zoom magnification that playfully highlighted the icons as they were moused over, and a bounce notification animation for applications seeking attention. This made the Dock a conspicuous, central aspect of the new Mac desktop.

The Dock comes to Windows

For over ten years, nothing significant happened to the Windows Taskbar apart from the application of new themes. After the release of Vista, Microsoft set out to develop conceptual ideas of how to rethink the Taskbar for the next major version of Windows. The ideas experimented with different types of round dial controls and busy box information panels to replace the standard Taskbar (below).

Windows 7 Taskbar

As Vista failed to gain traction in the market however, Microsoft canceled the more experimental ideas and worked to solve the real problems users had with Vista, converting Windows 7 from a major new release based on a new “MinWin” kernel to a more conservative update of Vista that supplied a simpler, more consistent interface and could be shipped at least a year sooner.

The result was a new Taskbar that borrows extensively from the NeXt/Mac Dock, with icons per application rather than per document, place holders for apps that can be launched, and Docklet menus for selecting an application’s individual windows or other menus specific to the application.

Microsoft also added some new things, including an icon scrub feature that highlights an application’s open windows similar to Exposé, as well as a recently used items “Jump List” for each docked application. Apple has yet to show its hand on coming enhancements to the Mac OS X desktop in Snow Leopard, but the back and forth borrowing between Apple and Microsoft may likely incorporate some aspects of the Windows 7, such as its expanded Docklet menus.

There are other new commonalities between Leopard and Windows 7 that Mac users who move between the two will likely find appealingly familiar, as the next segment will examine.

  • qka

    I disagree with your comment about Dock Magnification (aka zoom). I find it useful, although when it is used in a subtle way. The slight enlargement of Dock icons as I mouse over them is a useful visual cue, and helpful if the Dock is so crowded that the icons begin to get very small. However, I agree that Magnification that reminds you of the python that swallowed an elephant – whole! – is too much. But it might be useful to those with visual impairment, etc. Leave it to Apple to consider these things that we mere mortals might not.

  • http://ideasengine.cytv.com cy_starkman

    Daniel shows some love for Windows?

    I just wanted to add for the readers that the Acorn Archimedes was actually a revolutionary and important computer. Not just the footnote offered by Daniel.

    1) It was the first ‘home computer’ to use a RISC processor. Significant in that it was released in 1987; Apple took until 1994, a full 7 years later for its first 601.

    2) In 1987 and more so in 1988 RISC OS, the operating system for the Archimedes is also interesting in being the first desktop OS designed to run on a RISC platform. RISC OS lives on as an embedded operating system till this day making it one of the few 80’s OS’s to be still actively developed for and is broadly licensed.

    Apple took until System 7.1.2 and 1994 to have an OS designed for a RISC platform. To compare, MS never achieved a RISC implementation of their OS; while SUN an early champion of RISC released their first in 1989. NeXTStep, which became Apple’s OSX was ported to RISC in 1993. SGI IRIX, a very significant version of UNIX was coded over to RISC in 1990

    3) The company, British, who also designed the processor, not just the computer grew and morphed to become a little company you might have heard of. ARM. Who ultimately was the only successful ‘small name’ processor manufacturer to survive from that era and also the only genuine surviving RISC processor manufacturer. I suppose MIPS is sort of still alive.

    4) Apple in fact respected the work of Acorn so highly, that prior to 1990 they recognised their RISC processor as the only hope for a new platform being devised in those hallowed halls. Apple then worked with Acorn to develop the ARM as the processor for the Newton.

    So the Acorn Archimedes that Daniel footnotes is the direct ancestor of the iPhone’s brain in its chip and spirit, in the Newton; and led the way for Sun, SGI, NeXT and Apple in developing an operating system that ran on RISC CPU’s.

    Not a small matter by any means.

  • darwiniandude

    Great article Dan, and much as I detest windows I appreciate the objective balance in this article. Testing windows 7 myself it’s amusing what occurs when the taskbar gets too full; you get two rows of icons with scroll bar arrows on the right! :)

    Acorn Risc OS was great… The dock worked in a similar but different way. What impressed me about it though was the context sensitive menus. Instead of a menu bar always visible at the top of the screen, or on a per window basis in each window, the Risc OS used the middle mouse button to invoke a popup menu under the pointer. This saved mousing around, and also enabled the menu to reflect options based upon where you clicked, eg middle click something, copy… Middle click elsewhere, paste. Worked very well.

  • http://home.comcast.net/~daguy daGUY

    The problem I’ve always had with Windows is that each window is an application, not a document (hence why every window has its own menu bar). That’s fine if every application you use only opens one document, but it becomes a mess when apps need to open multiple documents. As Dan pointed out, MS came up with MDI, but this is sort of a clumsy workaround and it’s not used consistently between apps.

    This problem then bleeds into the taskbar – some buttons represent documents, while others represent apps that contain multiple documents. It becomes difficult to work with.

    Now, with Windows 7, Microsoft addressed one end of the problem but not the other. In the new taskbar, every button is an app, with windows accessible from popup thumbnails. Now it doesn’t matter if opens one document, opens multiple documents in separate windows, or opens multiple documents in an MDI window for the parent app – they all look and work the same through the taskbar. This is a big improvement.

    But at the same time, this is sort of like applying a bandaid to a wound. The reason WHY the taskbar was a mess to begin with was because there was no clearly-defined, standard way for single apps to work with multiple documents. As far as I know, this hasn’t changed. The new taskbar merely hides this problem – it doesn’t FIX it.

    What is Microsoft doing to actually address the real problem? Have they said “this is how a Windows 7 app should handle multiple documents”? Or is it still a free-for-all with each app behaving differently, because MS hasn’t provided any direction?

  • http://home.comcast.net/~daguy daGUY

    *EDIT: third sentence of the third paragraph in my first post should say, “Now it doesn’t matter if *an app* opens one document, opens multiple documents in separate windows, or opens multiple documents in an MDI window…” Sorry for the poor proofreading :-P