<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple rules out “iPhone nano,” not keen on Mac netbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/01/21/apple-rules-out-%e2%80%9ciphone-nano%e2%80%9d-not-keen-on-mac-netbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/01/21/apple-rules-out-%e2%80%9ciphone-nano%e2%80%9d-not-keen-on-mac-netbook/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Mad Hatter</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2009/01/21/apple-rules-out-%e2%80%9ciphone-nano%e2%80%9d-not-keen-on-mac-netbook/comment-page-1/#comment-16820</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Hatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=3045#comment-16820</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too bad. The local carrier who has the IPhone is Rogers Communications, and based on their price plan, they should be flying the Jolly Roger. I&#039;d be happy to get an IPhone without a data plan, but this isn&#039;t possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too bad. The local carrier who has the IPhone is Rogers Communications, and based on their price plan, they should be flying the Jolly Roger. I&#8217;d be happy to get an IPhone without a data plan, but this isn&#8217;t possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

