<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Apple Bail On Macworld Expo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:23:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rubénerd Blog / So Apple isn&#8217;t giving up trade shows?</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-24012</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubénerd Blog / So Apple isn&#8217;t giving up trade shows?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-24012</guid>
		<description>[...] this. I&#8217;ve thought his coverage of Apple related topics have been spot on in the past, but his post last year about why Apple ditched MacWorld was uncharacteristically shaky. Will he be able to reconcile this CES appearance after he&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this. I&#8217;ve thought his coverage of Apple related topics have been spot on in the past, but his post last year about why Apple ditched MacWorld was uncharacteristically shaky. Will he be able to reconcile this CES appearance after he&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: Apple Event set for January 26, 2010 &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-23279</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: Apple Event set for January 26, 2010 &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-23279</guid>
		<description>[...] has weaned itself from trade shows in general over the past decade, first pulling out of the summer Macworld Expo after IDG decided to move its venue from New York to Boston in 2003. Apple CEO Steve Jobs asked the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has weaned itself from trade shows in general over the past decade, first pulling out of the summer Macworld Expo after IDG decided to move its venue from New York to Boston in 2003. Apple CEO Steve Jobs asked the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5 &#124; i-Phones Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-17869</link>
		<dc:creator>ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5 &#124; i-Phones Plus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-17869</guid>
		<description>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Почему Apple больше не будет участвовать в Macworld &#124; Яблоки Arwen</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16538</link>
		<dc:creator>Почему Apple больше не будет участвовать в Macworld &#124; Яблоки Arwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16538</guid>
		<description>[...] почему так произошло. Недавно я наткнулась на статью Дэниэла Эрана Дилгера (Daniel Eran Dilger) «Why Did Apple Bail On Macworld [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] почему так произошло. Недавно я наткнулась на статью Дэниэла Эрана Дилгера (Daniel Eran Dilger) «Why Did Apple Bail On Macworld [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Plans To Attend CES In 2010 [Rumor] &#124; MyTriniPhone.com</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16494</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Plans To Attend CES In 2010 [Rumor] &#124; MyTriniPhone.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16494</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple has the capacity to blow out the lights at CES during Macworld Expo, why would it choose to abandon its own party and join one held in honor of Microsoft? It&#8217;s certainly not the timing of the event, as CES [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple has the capacity to blow out the lights at CES during Macworld Expo, why would it choose to abandon its own party and join one held in honor of Microsoft? It&#8217;s certainly not the timing of the event, as CES [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubenerd Blog &#187; So Apple isn&#8217;t giving up trade shows?</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16490</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubenerd Blog &#187; So Apple isn&#8217;t giving up trade shows?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16490</guid>
		<description>[...] this. I&#8217;ve thought his coverage of Apple related topics have been spot on in the past, but his post last year about why Apple ditched MacWorld was uncharacteristically shaky. Will he be able to reconcile this CES appearance after he&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this. I&#8217;ve thought his coverage of Apple related topics have been spot on in the past, but his post last year about why Apple ditched MacWorld was uncharacteristically shaky. Will he be able to reconcile this CES appearance after he&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5 &#124; Daily iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16485</link>
		<dc:creator>ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5 &#124; Daily iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16485</guid>
		<description>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TagSurfer &#187; Macworld &#8216;09 thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16440</link>
		<dc:creator>TagSurfer &#187; Macworld &#8216;09 thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16440</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a great article on why Apple bailed Macworld. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a great article on why Apple bailed Macworld. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5&#160;&#124;&#160;Iunlockr.Net</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16414</link>
		<dc:creator>ZOMG No Steve! Macworld Fallout Day 5&#160;&#124;&#160;Iunlockr.Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16414</guid>
		<description>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eran Dilger of RoughlyDrafted thinks bigger picture, that tech trade shows are dead: &#8220;The problem for Apple is that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjackb</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/12/17/why-did-apple-bail-on-macworld-expo/comment-page-1/#comment-16411</link>
		<dc:creator>rjackb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 03:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2956#comment-16411</guid>
		<description>@samgreen
I would like to echo an earlier reply to samgreen that the statistics he points to in his link for the Whipple procedure are for those with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and thus wildly misleading.

Steve Jobs &quot;did not have an adenocarcinoma, but rather an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which is, thankfully, much more likely to be cured surgically&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@samgreen<br />
I would like to echo an earlier reply to samgreen that the statistics he points to in his link for the Whipple procedure are for those with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and thus wildly misleading.</p>
<p>Steve Jobs &#8220;did not have an adenocarcinoma, but rather an islet cell neuroendocrine tumor, which is, thankfully, much more likely to be cured surgically&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
