<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google planning new Chrome browser based on WebKit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:15:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Myth 9: iPhone Unable to Penetrate Europe Due to Symbian Dominance &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/comment-page-1/#comment-14582</link>
		<dc:creator>Myth 9: iPhone Unable to Penetrate Europe Due to Symbian Dominance &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2349#comment-14582</guid>
		<description>[...] The Web Browser Renaissance: Firefox and Safari The Future of the Web: Safari, Firefox and Internet Explorer Google planning new Chrome browser based on WebKit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Web Browser Renaissance: Firefox and Safari The Future of the Web: Safari, Firefox and Internet Explorer Google planning new Chrome browser based on WebKit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuisDias</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/comment-page-1/#comment-11985</link>
		<dc:creator>LuisDias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2349#comment-11985</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else noticed the &quot;Wouldn&#039;t it be great...&quot; line in the first page of the comic? It made me chuckle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else noticed the &#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t it be great&#8230;&#8221; line in the first page of the comic? It made me chuckle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuisDias</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/comment-page-1/#comment-11979</link>
		<dc:creator>LuisDias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2349#comment-11979</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Tomtubbs, I agree. Daniel was spot on with his AJAX analysis. Clearly, &quot;open&quot; is the way, because it is so much stronger than its competition. I&#039;m very  curious about Chrome. I wonder if it&#039;s as good as it claims. Sure thing, it promises both in architecture and design!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Tomtubbs, I agree. Daniel was spot on with his AJAX analysis. Clearly, &#8220;open&#8221; is the way, because it is so much stronger than its competition. I&#8217;m very  curious about Chrome. I wonder if it&#8217;s as good as it claims. Sure thing, it promises both in architecture and design!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/comment-page-1/#comment-11959</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2349#comment-11959</guid>
		<description>The last couple articles have been missing the link to Apple Insider at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last couple articles have been missing the link to Apple Insider at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomtubbs</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/09/01/google-planning-new-chrome-browser-based-on-webkit/comment-page-1/#comment-11944</link>
		<dc:creator>tomtubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2349#comment-11944</guid>
		<description>Slide 37:  &quot;It&#039;s in our interest to make the internet better and without competition we have stagnation, that&#039;s why we&#039;re open sourcing the whole thing. we need the internet to be a fair, smart, safe place.&quot; You had it pretty spot on in a previous article (w.r.t. AIR, Silverlight, Flash, vs building openly).  Some features from different browsers - Opera front page,  Mozilla in parts, the idea of Javascript being pretty fundamental. The concept of making each tab separate sounds useful. Will Safari/Firefox/Opera have this? Gears is thrown in at the end, but no mention of what HTML 5 can do in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slide 37:  &#8220;It&#8217;s in our interest to make the internet better and without competition we have stagnation, that&#8217;s why we&#8217;re open sourcing the whole thing. we need the internet to be a fair, smart, safe place.&#8221; You had it pretty spot on in a previous article (w.r.t. AIR, Silverlight, Flash, vs building openly).  Some features from different browsers &#8211; Opera front page,  Mozilla in parts, the idea of Javascript being pretty fundamental. The concept of making each tab separate sounds useful. Will Safari/Firefox/Opera have this? Gears is thrown in at the end, but no mention of what HTML 5 can do in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
