<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Other iPhone Apps Store &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/comment-page-1/#comment-12505</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other iPhone Apps Store &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2271#comment-12505</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celeduc</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/comment-page-1/#comment-11878</link>
		<dc:creator>celeduc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2271#comment-11878</guid>
		<description>I went to WWDC where I was told that the conference videos would be available on the ADC area on  iTunes, so I didn&#039;t take as detailed notes as I might have otherwise.  But Apple still hasn&#039;t released the videos.  I guess I fell for it: I thought they&#039;d release them while they were still relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to WWDC where I was told that the conference videos would be available on the ADC area on  iTunes, so I didn&#8217;t take as detailed notes as I might have otherwise.  But Apple still hasn&#8217;t released the videos.  I guess I fell for it: I thought they&#8217;d release them while they were still relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA — RoughlyDrafted Magazine &#124; Michaels Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/comment-page-1/#comment-11877</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA — RoughlyDrafted Magazine &#124; Michaels Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2271#comment-11877</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA — RoughlyDrafted Magazine: &#8221; Subscribe via RSS RoughlyDrafted Magazine Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Apple keeps its iPhone 2.0 SDK under NDA — RoughlyDrafted Magazine: &#8221; Subscribe via RSS RoughlyDrafted Magazine Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whmlco</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/28/why-apple-keeps-its-iphone-20-sdk-under-nda/comment-page-1/#comment-11852</link>
		<dc:creator>whmlco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2271#comment-11852</guid>
		<description>Still unsatisfactory, especially when books, forums, and other forms of developer support are factored into the equation. Perhaps Apple should let NDAs drop on SHIPPING versions of the platform (currently 2.0.2), and keep developers under NDA on upcoming versions and beta versions (2.1).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still unsatisfactory, especially when books, forums, and other forms of developer support are factored into the equation. Perhaps Apple should let NDAs drop on SHIPPING versions of the platform (currently 2.0.2), and keep developers under NDA on upcoming versions and beta versions (2.1).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

