<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Apple&#8217;s MobileMe Secure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? at iFonePlanet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-13627</link>
		<dc:creator>Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? at iFonePlanet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-13627</guid>
		<description>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? &#124; iPhone The Solution 3G</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-12053</link>
		<dc:creator>Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? &#124; iPhone The Solution 3G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-12053</guid>
		<description>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? &#124; The iPhone Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-12050</link>
		<dc:creator>Is MobileMe Secure Enough for Your Data? &#124; The iPhone Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-12050</guid>
		<description>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the web went wild. Daniel Eran Dilger, took the crown off to retort them all over at Roughly Drafted: For the record: Apple’s MobileMe desktop email can be secured via encrypted SMTP and IMAP; Apple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Google&#8217;s GMail SSL Doesn&#8217;t Really Protect Users From Spoofing &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-12044</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Google&#8217;s GMail SSL Doesn&#8217;t Really Protect Users From Spoofing &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-12044</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Apple’s MobileMe Secure? MobileMe identity crisis.  That&#8217;s not to say Apple hasn&#8217;t delivered its own unnecessary warnings. Users of .Mac received a similar error message from Mail at the transition to MobileMe. The warning complains of an invalid security certificate because of a host name mismatch. While not worded in the same high fear panic of Chrome, Apple does warn that this could put ”your confidential information at risk.“ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Apple’s MobileMe Secure? MobileMe identity crisis.  That&#8217;s not to say Apple hasn&#8217;t delivered its own unnecessary warnings. Users of .Mac received a similar error message from Mail at the transition to MobileMe. The warning complains of an invalid security certificate because of a host name mismatch. While not worded in the same high fear panic of Chrome, Apple does warn that this could put ”your confidential information at risk.“ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Android Market Guarantees Problems for Users &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11699</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Android Market Guarantees Problems for Users &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11699</guid>
		<description>[...] Is Apple’s MobileMe Secure? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is Apple’s MobileMe Secure? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scred Blog &#187; Apple&#8217;s lax security with MobileMe</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11600</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scred Blog &#187; Apple&#8217;s lax security with MobileMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11600</guid>
		<description>[...] MobileMe&#8217;s webmail and Apple&#8217;s iDisk are not encrypted. Discussion of this available here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MobileMe&#8217;s webmail and Apple&#8217;s iDisk are not encrypted. Discussion of this available here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How secure is MobileMe? &#124; Stan's List</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11478</link>
		<dc:creator>How secure is MobileMe? &#124; Stan's List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11478</guid>
		<description>[...] RoughlyDrafted does a critic of several articles, with links back, on the level of MobileMe security, if any. The security is varied and depending on what area, whether desktop or web. What does this mean with email, calendar, data and web access? A good read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RoughlyDrafted does a critic of several articles, with links back, on the level of MobileMe security, if any. The security is varied and depending on what area, whether desktop or web. What does this mean with email, calendar, data and web access? A good read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webheads</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11462</link>
		<dc:creator>webheads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11462</guid>
		<description>Great Article Daniel.  I have respected your articles for a long time now and often reference them when considering computer questions.

I have a question for you.  A great deal is being said lately about security on the Mac, it&#039;s as though people want to create a belief that Macs have security problems just so they can criticize Apple.  But I have been online with a Mac for almost 12 years now and I have yet to encounter a security problem either with a virus or my email being compromised or with malware.  However, 2 years ago I used my sister-in-law&#039;s windows laptop to surf the web and in under an hour I had such bad security issues and malware downloads that the Hard Drive became so slow and bogged down it had to be completely erased.  If security is such a big issue, and apple is so bad at implementing security on their products and simply doesn’t care about security, then why is it that I am having no troubles with security on my Mac, online or otherwise?  Some like to say it&#039;s just because Macs are not as popular, but you have dispelled that myth here before.

Can you provide some real world documentation of where Mac computers have been hacked or security has been breeched due to security flaws in Apple’s products?  Maybe some situations where a person’s or company’s finances have been compromised and the thieves have made off scott free with all the money?  Something like that.  I need to see some real world evidence that security is an issue on the Mac before I can start getting worried about it.  I have seen a few phishing emails before but nothing that I wasn’t too stupid to ignore.  I guess what I’m asking is are they any great security loop holes out there for the Mac that are currently being exploited that can really do some damage that we should all be worried about?  I’m not sure, maybe there is?  Is there a great and terrible phishing email out there that is making millions off of unsuspecting Mac users and laughing all the way to the bank?  Or is all this fuss really for nothing?  I mean it’s great to create security systems before security loopholes are found by the hackers but at the same time I don’t see any real world evidence of security exploits on the Mac and therefore I don’t see the justification for the recent rash of Apple security bashing.  The world will end in 1 million years, is anyone worried if their affairs are in order?  The Mac maybe could have security concerns, but until it does, should I worry about it?

Thanks
Webheads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article Daniel.  I have respected your articles for a long time now and often reference them when considering computer questions.</p>
<p>I have a question for you.  A great deal is being said lately about security on the Mac, it&#8217;s as though people want to create a belief that Macs have security problems just so they can criticize Apple.  But I have been online with a Mac for almost 12 years now and I have yet to encounter a security problem either with a virus or my email being compromised or with malware.  However, 2 years ago I used my sister-in-law&#8217;s windows laptop to surf the web and in under an hour I had such bad security issues and malware downloads that the Hard Drive became so slow and bogged down it had to be completely erased.  If security is such a big issue, and apple is so bad at implementing security on their products and simply doesn’t care about security, then why is it that I am having no troubles with security on my Mac, online or otherwise?  Some like to say it&#8217;s just because Macs are not as popular, but you have dispelled that myth here before.</p>
<p>Can you provide some real world documentation of where Mac computers have been hacked or security has been breeched due to security flaws in Apple’s products?  Maybe some situations where a person’s or company’s finances have been compromised and the thieves have made off scott free with all the money?  Something like that.  I need to see some real world evidence that security is an issue on the Mac before I can start getting worried about it.  I have seen a few phishing emails before but nothing that I wasn’t too stupid to ignore.  I guess what I’m asking is are they any great security loop holes out there for the Mac that are currently being exploited that can really do some damage that we should all be worried about?  I’m not sure, maybe there is?  Is there a great and terrible phishing email out there that is making millions off of unsuspecting Mac users and laughing all the way to the bank?  Or is all this fuss really for nothing?  I mean it’s great to create security systems before security loopholes are found by the hackers but at the same time I don’t see any real world evidence of security exploits on the Mac and therefore I don’t see the justification for the recent rash of Apple security bashing.  The world will end in 1 million years, is anyone worried if their affairs are in order?  The Mac maybe could have security concerns, but until it does, should I worry about it?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Webheads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11461</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11461</guid>
		<description>Someday we must get to the bottom of this alter-ego thing. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someday we must get to the bottom of this alter-ego thing. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danieleran</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/08/22/is-apples-mobileme-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-11460</link>
		<dc:creator>danieleran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=2187#comment-11460</guid>
		<description>&quot;Should&quot; is a big word. 

There are various reasons for posting it here instead, with the loose wording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Should&#8221; is a big word. </p>
<p>There are various reasons for posting it here instead, with the loose wording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

