<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SproutCore Mailroom Managing Obama&#8217;s Presidential Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:15:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lmasanti</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>lmasanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>quote:
&quot;What would be the advantage of using this technology over Ruby on Rails, other MVC frameworks, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC (which is new), etc.? Esp. one that relies on a lot of database usage.&quot;

SproutCore is just for the client-side. You must still use those tools (RoR, by example) to process the server-side... &quot;relies on a lot of database usage&quot;.

SC and RoR are open sourced and free to use.
ASP.NET et al. are propietary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:<br />
&#8220;What would be the advantage of using this technology over Ruby on Rails, other MVC frameworks, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC (which is new), etc.? Esp. one that relies on a lot of database usage.&#8221;</p>
<p>SproutCore is just for the client-side. You must still use those tools (RoR, by example) to process the server-side&#8230; &#8220;relies on a lot of database usage&#8221;.</p>
<p>SC and RoR are open sourced and free to use.<br />
ASP.NET et al. are propietary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9552</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9552</guid>
		<description>@ geoffrobinson

Ten minutes with the aforelinked RDM article and you&#039;ll have your answer.

Steer clear of .NET in particular. Otherwise Obama might need a copy of Parallels to run your rich web app!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ geoffrobinson</p>
<p>Ten minutes with the aforelinked RDM article and you&#8217;ll have your answer.</p>
<p>Steer clear of .NET in particular. Otherwise Obama might need a copy of Parallels to run your rich web app!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoffrobinson</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9546</link>
		<dc:creator>geoffrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9546</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t done web development in years, but a recent opportunity has come out. Forgive me for not reading the previous Sproutcore articles thoroughly, but let me ask a question.

What would be the advantage of using this technology over Ruby on Rails, other MVC frameworks, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC (which is new), etc.? Esp. one that relies on a lot of database usage.

I ask because I don&#039;t have the time to learn a bunch of technologies before choosing one to start developing in. I need to choose one and go with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t done web development in years, but a recent opportunity has come out. Forgive me for not reading the previous Sproutcore articles thoroughly, but let me ask a question.</p>
<p>What would be the advantage of using this technology over Ruby on Rails, other MVC frameworks, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC (which is new), etc.? Esp. one that relies on a lot of database usage.</p>
<p>I ask because I don&#8217;t have the time to learn a bunch of technologies before choosing one to start developing in. I need to choose one and go with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gus2000</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>gus2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>Obama/Jobs &#039;08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama/Jobs &#8216;08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnWatkins</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9513</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnWatkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9513</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how odd Safari 3.1.1 on a PPC G4 is, but I found the photo gallery demo rather buggy using using them.
it needs work, but I can see the potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how odd Safari 3.1.1 on a PPC G4 is, but I found the photo gallery demo rather buggy using using them.<br />
it needs work, but I can see the potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nat</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/17/sproutcore-mailroom-managing-obamas-presidential-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9511</link>
		<dc:creator>nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1951#comment-9511</guid>
		<description>&quot;Update 2: Reports indicate McCain’s campaign staffers also use Mailroom.&quot;

They&#039;re probably thinking of an actual mail room. :b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Update 2: Reports indicate McCain’s campaign staffers also use Mailroom.&#8221;</p>
<p>They&#8217;re probably thinking of an actual mail room. :b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
