<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWDC 2008: iPhone G3 Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ephilei</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephilei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-10192</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain how 3G approaches "Wifi speeds"?! Wifi is only limited by your ISP cap which is potentially far faster than 3G. Sounds like dirty marketing comparing 3G (which I'm sure was done in ideal environment) with what had to have been a crippled Wifi g network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain how 3G approaches &#8220;Wifi speeds&#8221;?! Wifi is only limited by your ISP cap which is potentially far faster than 3G. Sounds like dirty marketing comparing 3G (which I&#8217;m sure was done in ideal environment) with what had to have been a crippled Wifi g network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whmlco</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9234</link>
		<dc:creator>whmlco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9234</guid>
		<description>AdamC, If I want to do serious photography I'll dig out my 1Ds. But that doesn't change the fact that I'd prefer my snapshots of family and friends didn't look like crap.

If Apple is going to embed functionality into the phone, then it should at least be able to do the job one would expect of it.

Including a bare-bones 2MP camera is like adding video iPod functionality... to a 2GB iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdamC, If I want to do serious photography I&#8217;ll dig out my 1Ds. But that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that I&#8217;d prefer my snapshots of family and friends didn&#8217;t look like crap.</p>
<p>If Apple is going to embed functionality into the phone, then it should at least be able to do the job one would expect of it.</p>
<p>Including a bare-bones 2MP camera is like adding video iPod functionality&#8230; to a 2GB iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWDC 2008: iPhone G3 Revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9206</link>
		<dc:creator>WWDC 2008: iPhone G3 Revealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9206</guid>
		<description>[...] Story here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Story here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrictNon-Conformist</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator>StrictNon-Conformist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9200</guid>
		<description>AdamC, I think you must have been tired to address that reply to me, when whmlco seems like the appropriate person to respond to ;)

Being an owner of an iPhone, I'm well aware of its traits, including the fact that the camera is merely that of being part of the expectation of being able to take pictures, but not focusing (pardon the pun) on photographic quality, but instead putting more into the whole phone as a phone.

I was noting that Daniel made a mistake with the year in his post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdamC, I think you must have been tired to address that reply to me, when whmlco seems like the appropriate person to respond to ;)</p>
<p>Being an owner of an iPhone, I&#8217;m well aware of its traits, including the fact that the camera is merely that of being part of the expectation of being able to take pictures, but not focusing (pardon the pun) on photographic quality, but instead putting more into the whole phone as a phone.</p>
<p>I was noting that Daniel made a mistake with the year in his post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamC</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9189</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9189</guid>
		<description>StrictNon-Conformist, the magic of the iPhone is the touch property. Using just the finger to scroll and everything makes the iPhone a wonder on its own which no mobile phone comes close. It is actually tomorrow whereas every other mobile phone is yesterday.
BTW serious photography is done by a camera not one in a mobile phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StrictNon-Conformist, the magic of the iPhone is the touch property. Using just the finger to scroll and everything makes the iPhone a wonder on its own which no mobile phone comes close. It is actually tomorrow whereas every other mobile phone is yesterday.<br />
BTW serious photography is done by a camera not one in a mobile phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrictNon-Conformist</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator>StrictNon-Conformist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9168</guid>
		<description>"Apple did something nobody expected at WWDC: it managed to keep its new “iPhone 3G” design, features, and price under tight wraps up until Steve Jobs’ keynote today, foiling the efforts of online spies trying to scoop the news on the hottest product of 2007."

Hey, wait, is the iPhone 3G so last year? ;)  Darn time travel machine must have left you confused as to the current date :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apple did something nobody expected at WWDC: it managed to keep its new “iPhone 3G” design, features, and price under tight wraps up until Steve Jobs’ keynote today, foiling the efforts of online spies trying to scoop the news on the hottest product of 2007.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, wait, is the iPhone 3G so last year? ;)  Darn time travel machine must have left you confused as to the current date :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9167</guid>
		<description>I doubt the increased battery life is due to a more efficient chipset. Apple uses the same off the shelf components as every other manufacturer.

I'm sure that the big gains in battery life are from software changes, as OSX is increasingly optimized for mobile devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the increased battery life is due to a more efficient chipset. Apple uses the same off the shelf components as every other manufacturer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that the big gains in battery life are from software changes, as OSX is increasingly optimized for mobile devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whmlco</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9156</link>
		<dc:creator>whmlco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9156</guid>
		<description>The "tech specs" page on Apple's web indicates that the camera resolution is still 2MP.

The lack of an upgrade to the camera is in fact the biggest disappointment to me, as the existing 2MP camera takes pretty crappy photos in anything but bright sunlight. Plus competitor's products are hitting 3 and 5MP, with enough detail to generate useable photos.

And I doubt that Apple has improved the software with any image processing tools (exposure, saturation) or video. If so, they would have shown it, as even the lowly calculator got a mention due to the addition of scientific functions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;tech specs&#8221; page on Apple&#8217;s web indicates that the camera resolution is still 2MP.</p>
<p>The lack of an upgrade to the camera is in fact the biggest disappointment to me, as the existing 2MP camera takes pretty crappy photos in anything but bright sunlight. Plus competitor&#8217;s products are hitting 3 and 5MP, with enough detail to generate useable photos.</p>
<p>And I doubt that Apple has improved the software with any image processing tools (exposure, saturation) or video. If so, they would have shown it, as even the lowly calculator got a mention due to the addition of scientific functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9155</link>
		<dc:creator>harrywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9155</guid>
		<description>Just happy that its finally in Canada - sadly my $600 16gb V.1 iPhone is now worth about $200 at most, but as I am a good customer of the not-very-good Rogers network, I found out today that I get a 'hardware upgrade' and will pay about $99 for my G3/3G (!) iPhone!
I think I will be using the 3G switch off option in the preferences, and turning it on for surfing and email.

With Me.com, its going to be cool to have everything updated without plugging in.
I was, I admit, thinking of a video conference function, and maybe a slightly better camera, and maybe cut and paste(although I think this is a 2.0 app possibility?) - but I think that Apple has done a great job, and also dropped the price so dramatically.
You have to expect all kinds of accessories to emerge now we are on 3G and 2.0.
This thing is going to sell huge!

Clear analysis Dan, as usual - any idea why they are allowing TWO months of no sales of the iPhone at all? Isnt that a potential loss of  12-15% of yearly sales?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just happy that its finally in Canada - sadly my $600 16gb V.1 iPhone is now worth about $200 at most, but as I am a good customer of the not-very-good Rogers network, I found out today that I get a &#8216;hardware upgrade&#8217; and will pay about $99 for my G3/3G (!) iPhone!<br />
I think I will be using the 3G switch off option in the preferences, and turning it on for surfing and email.</p>
<p>With Me.com, its going to be cool to have everything updated without plugging in.<br />
I was, I admit, thinking of a video conference function, and maybe a slightly better camera, and maybe cut and paste(although I think this is a 2.0 app possibility?) - but I think that Apple has done a great job, and also dropped the price so dramatically.<br />
You have to expect all kinds of accessories to emerge now we are on 3G and 2.0.<br />
This thing is going to sell huge!</p>
<p>Clear analysis Dan, as usual - any idea why they are allowing TWO months of no sales of the iPhone at all? Isnt that a potential loss of  12-15% of yearly sales?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuhong</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/06/09/wwdc-2008-iphone-g3-revealed/#comment-9153</link>
		<dc:creator>yuhong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/?p=1914#comment-9153</guid>
		<description>You did not talk about push notification and how WM's task manager is a "joke".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did not talk about push notification and how WM&#8217;s task manager is a &#8220;joke&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
