<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring Time Capsule: WiFi 802.11n and the 5GHz band</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:17:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NB</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/comment-page-1/#comment-6854</link>
		<dc:creator>NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/#comment-6854</guid>
		<description>&quot;Earlier versions of the WiFi specification all used the 2.4GHz radio spectrum.&quot;

Not true at all.  802.11a works at various frequencies around 5 GHz, at 54 Mbps.

*Consumer* access points and &quot;WiFi routers&quot; all used 802.11b/g radios, with some rare exceptions, such as the Linksys WRT54AG and the Buffalo AirStation WHR-HP-AG108, which had two independent radios and supported two SSIDs.

I&#039;m a happy user of the latter and had to look for quite a while before I found one for sale. I had to leave the 2.4 GHz band as it got too crowded with WiFi and crap like TV extenders.

Sadly, Apple did not do dual-radio for the latest AirPort Extreme, even though the cheapest AirPort is already more expensive than that AirStation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Earlier versions of the WiFi specification all used the 2.4GHz radio spectrum.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not true at all.  802.11a works at various frequencies around 5 GHz, at 54 Mbps.</p>
<p>*Consumer* access points and &#8220;WiFi routers&#8221; all used 802.11b/g radios, with some rare exceptions, such as the Linksys WRT54AG and the Buffalo AirStation WHR-HP-AG108, which had two independent radios and supported two SSIDs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a happy user of the latter and had to look for quite a while before I found one for sale. I had to leave the 2.4 GHz band as it got too crowded with WiFi and crap like TV extenders.</p>
<p>Sadly, Apple did not do dual-radio for the latest AirPort Extreme, even though the cheapest AirPort is already more expensive than that AirStation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/comment-page-1/#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/31/exploring-time-capsule-wifi-80211n-and-the-5ghz-band/#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>Remember: Signal as stated in the chart inside Airport Utility is actually stronger when you get closer to zero. Confusing but true. Try it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember: Signal as stated in the chart inside Airport Utility is actually stronger when you get closer to zero. Confusing but true. Try it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
