<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:31:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Palm Pre/iPhone Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-19450</link>
		<dc:creator>The Palm Pre/iPhone Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-19450</guid>
		<description>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth Real Multitasking After successfully delivering the premise of an intuitive graphical computing environment in a commercial product, Steve Jobs wanted Apple to aggressively move the Mac environment on top of a more sophisticated foundation. A new “Super Mac” operating system was explored, as was a partnership with both AT&amp;T (then the owner of commercial Unix) and a joint engineering project with Apollo, a workstation vendor that produced a Unix-like, sophisticated operating system called Domain/OS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth Real Multitasking After successfully delivering the premise of an intuitive graphical computing environment in a commercial product, Steve Jobs wanted Apple to aggressively move the Mac environment on top of a more sophisticated foundation. A new “Super Mac” operating system was explored, as was a partnership with both AT&amp;T (then the owner of commercial Unix) and a joint engineering project with Apollo, a workstation vendor that produced a Unix-like, sophisticated operating system called Domain/OS. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The big 3.0: How iPhone will shift peripheral devices &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-17903</link>
		<dc:creator>The big 3.0: How iPhone will shift peripheral devices &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-17903</guid>
		<description>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth Gone in a Flash: More on Apple’s iPhone Web Plans Flash Wars: Adobe in the History and Future of Flash SCO, Linux, and Microsoft in the History of OS: 1970s SCO, Linux, and Microsoft in the History of OS: 1980s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth Gone in a Flash: More on Apple’s iPhone Web Plans Flash Wars: Adobe in the History and Future of Flash SCO, Linux, and Microsoft in the History of OS: 1970s SCO, Linux, and Microsoft in the History of OS: 1980s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2 anos depois, conseguimos definir o que é o iPhone? &#171; Indistinguível da Magia</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-17513</link>
		<dc:creator>2 anos depois, conseguimos definir o que é o iPhone? &#171; Indistinguível da Magia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-17513</guid>
		<description>[...] é uma crítica mais complexa. Não é que o iPhone não suporte esses recursos, o fato é que os desenvolvedores não têm acesso a eles no momento de desenvolver seus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] é uma crítica mais complexa. Não é que o iPhone não suporte esses recursos, o fato é que os desenvolvedores não têm acesso a eles no momento de desenvolver seus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Push To The Background: Will &#34;iPhone 3.0&#34; FINALLY Support True Multitasking? &#124; iPhone 3G Tricks</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-17197</link>
		<dc:creator>Push To The Background: Will &#34;iPhone 3.0&#34; FINALLY Support True Multitasking? &#124; iPhone 3G Tricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-17197</guid>
		<description>[...] (And here&#8217;s a great article on why the iPhone, in its current incarnation, CAN multitask &amp;#8212...) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (And here&#8217;s a great article on why the iPhone, in its current incarnation, CAN multitask &amp;#8212&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I will not be getting an iPhone : The Brits Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-14995</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I will not be getting an iPhone : The Brits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-14995</guid>
		<description>[...] lack of multi-tasking on the iPhone, which isn&#8217;t strictly true as both The iPod Observer and RoughlyDrafted Magazine point out in illuminating articles. (By the way the iPod Obeserver Article is shorter, for those of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lack of multi-tasking on the iPhone, which isn&#8217;t strictly true as both The iPod Observer and RoughlyDrafted Magazine point out in illuminating articles. (By the way the iPod Obeserver Article is shorter, for those of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Apple Plays God with the iPhone SDK &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-11621</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Apple Plays God with the iPhone SDK &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-11621</guid>
		<description>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Launch to the New iphone - Page 9 - Nokia N95Users</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-10646</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Launch to the New iphone - Page 9 - Nokia N95Users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-10646</guid>
		<description>[...] Also I don&#039;t know where you guys are getting information that the iPhone can&#039;t multitask: iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine    __________________ If you find my (or anybody else&#039;s) help please use the Thanks button! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also I don&#8217;t know where you guys are getting information that the iPhone can&#8217;t multitask: iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine    __________________ If you find my (or anybody else&#8217;s) help please use the Thanks button! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile EEE PC, UMPC, and Internet Tablets vs the iPhone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile EEE PC, UMPC, and Internet Tablets vs the iPhone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>[...] Jobs Ends iPhone SDK Panic iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work iPhone 2.0 SDK: Video Games to Rival Nintendo DS, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jobs Ends iPhone SDK Panic iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth iPhone 2.0 SDK: How Signing Certificates Work iPhone 2.0 SDK: Video Games to Rival Nintendo DS, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eraser&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-7255</link>
		<dc:creator>eraser&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iPhone 2.0 SDK: The No Multitasking Myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-7255</guid>
		<description>[...] inability to run multiple applications at once. The suggestion is that the iPhone is a &#8230; www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/ RoughlyDrafted Magazine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inability to run multiple applications at once. The suggestion is that the iPhone is a &#8230; <a href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/</a> RoughlyDrafted Magazine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pecos.bill</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/comment-page-3/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>pecos.bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>Very well written.

I also agree with another commenter that at some point Apple might open up task specific threads such as an AIM listener. Those would be required to be vetted by Apple before release. I would presume those will run as child processes to a babysitter task that could throttle them as needed. To my knowledge, such a thing does not exist in Mac OS X, and coupled with the huge effort to get the SDK, wasn&#039;t even considered.

Unless AIM currently supports some flavor of message queuing, I&#039;m not sure what would happen with the messages when the AIM client isn&#039;t running. Currently, AIM doesn&#039;t allow queuing messages while users are offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written.</p>
<p>I also agree with another commenter that at some point Apple might open up task specific threads such as an AIM listener. Those would be required to be vetted by Apple before release. I would presume those will run as child processes to a babysitter task that could throttle them as needed. To my knowledge, such a thing does not exist in Mac OS X, and coupled with the huge effort to get the SDK, wasn&#8217;t even considered.</p>
<p>Unless AIM currently supports some flavor of message queuing, I&#8217;m not sure what would happen with the messages when the AIM client isn&#8217;t running. Currently, AIM doesn&#8217;t allow queuing messages while users are offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
