Comments on: Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines

By: SmartPhone “race” heats up - will the best “appstore” define who wins? | Blogging Idol

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:18:47 +0000

[...] enter the mobile hardware fray. With what Apple is poised to be able to do in this space from a revenue potential, and the legion of developers out there in the Microsoft camp, that I will tell you (being one of [...]

By: Myth 10: RIM’s BlackBerry Will Contain iPhone Expansion — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:12:01 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone vs Smartphone Software Makers Apple’s iPhone vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines [...]

By: Will the iPhone Meet its Match from a Modern Day DOS? — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:30:29 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines Apple’s iPhone vs Smartphone Software Makers [...]

By: Mobile EEE PC, UMPC, and Internet Tablets vs the iPhone — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Tue, 20 May 2008 17:34:33 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines Filling the Unlocked iPhone Gap with .Mac [...]

By: iPod Game Console, Tablet at WWDC? Highly Unlikely — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Tue, 13 May 2008 10:43:02 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines [...]

By: Are iPhone Sales Limited to Apple Fans? Apparently Not. — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:44:45 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines How AT&T Picked Up the iPhone: A Brief History of Mobiles [...]

By: Apple’s iPhone vs Smartphone Software Makers — RoughlyDrafted Magazine

Fri, 07 Mar 2008 06:04:10 +0000

[...] Apple’s iPhone Vs. Other Mobile Hardware Makers: 5 Revenue Engines But what about pure software makers? Will Microsoft or Google or the open source community deliver a good enough equivalent version of the iPhones’ software features to enable generic hardware makers to catch up in the same way that Microsoft ported Apple’s unpatented Mac technology to the PC in the late 80s? Here’s a look at the threats posed by rival smartphone software makers, and how well the iPhone will be able to compete against them. Windows Mobile vs the iPhone. Microsoft has been desperately working to duplicate its Windows PC monopoly among PDA and phone makers, but after ten years of investing in WinCE development, it’s found nothing but extreme failure, with regular annual losses counting into the billions. Its Windows Mobile business has been passed up by RIM and Apple, both of which only entered the phone business recently. Why couldn’t Microsoft make its PC model work in the handheld devices market? [...]

By: WholesaleMagic

WholesaleMagic — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 00:24:11 +0000

@Rich: Even so, I still can’t understand why one supports iSync and the other doesn’t.

By: John Muir

John Muir — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:45:02 +0000

@ elppa

When discussing operating systems now – at least desktop / server ones – we’re long past the day when it was seriously about how complete or functional they were. Apart from problems peculiar to Microsoft, most everything is mature now and can be used to fulfill whatever technical needs come to mind with the appropriate software.

However, so very true, it’s the last part which nails it. If everyone were a Linux or Solaris guru and had infinite time on their hands: usability would be irrelevant. Unfortunately, this is obviously not the case. Now would someone mind passing it on up!?

By: elppa

elppa — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:26:43 +0000

@REB Sun’s Solaris is very advanced as an Operating System and as good as if not better than OS X in some areas, but in terms of user friendliness it doesn’t come close.