<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Oracle might kill Google&#8217;s Android and software patents all at once &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-31244</link>
		<dc:creator>How Oracle might kill Google&#8217;s Android and software patents all at once &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-31244</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? Anyone who thinks Google looks before it leaps has forgotten that Google only ever leaps, buying up regular new companies on a schedule rather than with a strategy, and blowing out one failed project after another (Answers, Base, Buzz, Catalogs, Dodgeball, Jaiku, Knol, Lively, Notebook, Orkut, Sidewiki, the Nexus One, Google Video, Wave, ad naseum). Google acts like a white trash family who won the world&#8217;s largest lottery, which is why it behaves just like Microsoft. Some companies actually early their revenues in a competitive marketplace, and have for generations of technology, like say, Apple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? Anyone who thinks Google looks before it leaps has forgotten that Google only ever leaps, buying up regular new companies on a schedule rather than with a strategy, and blowing out one failed project after another (Answers, Base, Buzz, Catalogs, Dodgeball, Jaiku, Knol, Lively, Notebook, Orkut, Sidewiki, the Nexus One, Google Video, Wave, ad naseum). Google acts like a white trash family who won the world&#8217;s largest lottery, which is why it behaves just like Microsoft. Some companies actually early their revenues in a competitive marketplace, and have for generations of technology, like say, Apple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Microsoft Got Bing, And Why It Is Failing to Matter &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-20340</link>
		<dc:creator>How Microsoft Got Bing, And Why It Is Failing to Matter &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-20340</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? Five Factors Shifting the Future of Malware and Platform Security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? Five Factors Shifting the Future of Malware and Platform Security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Palm Pre/iPhone Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-19455</link>
		<dc:creator>The Palm Pre/iPhone Multitasking Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-19455</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows XP Media Center Edition vs Apple TV (Web TV) Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows XP Media Center Edition vs Apple TV (Web TV) Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Bing share vs Google smaller than Safari vs IE &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-19263</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Bing share vs Google smaller than Safari vs IE &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-19263</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roper117</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-16407</link>
		<dc:creator>roper117</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-16407</guid>
		<description>I love this article and it is true - the merger seems a bad move for Redmond but Yahoo, unlike Google has not shrugged off completely its use of Microsoft technologies and though more tied to Open solutions it would not be a completely foreign environment for Microsoft.

The fact is the Buyout of Yahoo terrifies the heck out of all MS haters (myself included) who use Microsoft only but for a lack of alternatives.   The bottom line is that Microsoft is a paranoid dictator who feels the walls closing in at the height of power.  Microsoft, like oil production, has peeked.   OS adoption is slow.  Competitors are making in roads and consumers are finding alternatives.  Zune is awful, Apple wins, MSN/Live Search is stiff and proprietary - My ASP sites always outrank my PHP sites on Live search, and Apple is not just for academics anymore.  Ubuntu and other Linux distros are widely adopted for servers and Google has joined the browser war with Chrome.  Microsoft underlying fear is dying from a thousand paper cuts but more so, much more so the cancer (in their mind) that will kill them is looming ominously but quietly in the halls of Google.  Google&#039;s search engine dominance is almost as monopolistic as Microsoft&#039;s hold on desktop Oss but like Microsoft before them Google isn’t reinventing the wheel, they are following proven examples.  Google is adopting more and more open technologies that are more stable, less proprietary and CHEAPER to adopt.   Vista requires a hardware upgrade for adoption in a business centers.  Linux distros are fast becoming user-friendly and every day support more and more web apps.  

Google is planning an OS.  Google is the only name big enough for widespread adoption, Google is already in OS business on its own, Google tweaks Linux distros for its own server purposes and who the heck wouldn&#039;t buy a Dell or HP (or Acer or Lenovo)&quot;Powered by Google&quot; with ton&#039;s of web apps.  Dell has given in to Microsoft and backed off its Linux units but in the face of a major onslaught of competition, PC manufacturers just might stop being bullied.  Linux is more stable and that can be proven in crash testing. Google is spending (millions of) their own dollars to make WINE handle the most popular apps like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, and Quickbooks.   Google OS is coming.  I don&#039;t know what it will be called but it will be here soon.  At it&#039;s core will be something like Ubuntu Linux and Microsoft knows it.  They know they have a brand problem and if they can release a web application enabled OS with Yahoo (powered by Microsoft in small print) they can compete.  Hell they may even switch to Linux Kernel core eventually as well (but I doubt it).  The Yahoo bid is designed for one reason and one reason, it is a stop gap against loosing their core monopoly- the Desktop OS market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this article and it is true &#8211; the merger seems a bad move for Redmond but Yahoo, unlike Google has not shrugged off completely its use of Microsoft technologies and though more tied to Open solutions it would not be a completely foreign environment for Microsoft.</p>
<p>The fact is the Buyout of Yahoo terrifies the heck out of all MS haters (myself included) who use Microsoft only but for a lack of alternatives.   The bottom line is that Microsoft is a paranoid dictator who feels the walls closing in at the height of power.  Microsoft, like oil production, has peeked.   OS adoption is slow.  Competitors are making in roads and consumers are finding alternatives.  Zune is awful, Apple wins, MSN/Live Search is stiff and proprietary &#8211; My ASP sites always outrank my PHP sites on Live search, and Apple is not just for academics anymore.  Ubuntu and other Linux distros are widely adopted for servers and Google has joined the browser war with Chrome.  Microsoft underlying fear is dying from a thousand paper cuts but more so, much more so the cancer (in their mind) that will kill them is looming ominously but quietly in the halls of Google.  Google&#8217;s search engine dominance is almost as monopolistic as Microsoft&#8217;s hold on desktop Oss but like Microsoft before them Google isn’t reinventing the wheel, they are following proven examples.  Google is adopting more and more open technologies that are more stable, less proprietary and CHEAPER to adopt.   Vista requires a hardware upgrade for adoption in a business centers.  Linux distros are fast becoming user-friendly and every day support more and more web apps.  </p>
<p>Google is planning an OS.  Google is the only name big enough for widespread adoption, Google is already in OS business on its own, Google tweaks Linux distros for its own server purposes and who the heck wouldn&#8217;t buy a Dell or HP (or Acer or Lenovo)&#8221;Powered by Google&#8221; with ton&#8217;s of web apps.  Dell has given in to Microsoft and backed off its Linux units but in the face of a major onslaught of competition, PC manufacturers just might stop being bullied.  Linux is more stable and that can be proven in crash testing. Google is spending (millions of) their own dollars to make WINE handle the most popular apps like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, and Quickbooks.   Google OS is coming.  I don&#8217;t know what it will be called but it will be here soon.  At it&#8217;s core will be something like Ubuntu Linux and Microsoft knows it.  They know they have a brand problem and if they can release a web application enabled OS with Yahoo (powered by Microsoft in small print) they can compete.  Hell they may even switch to Linux Kernel core eventually as well (but I doubt it).  The Yahoo bid is designed for one reason and one reason, it is a stop gap against loosing their core monopoly- the Desktop OS market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft&#8217;s Zune, Vista, and Windows Mobile 7 Strategy vs the iPhone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-11056</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft&#8217;s Zune, Vista, and Windows Mobile 7 Strategy vs the iPhone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-11056</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Office Wars 4 - Microsoft’s Assault on Lotus and IBM Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Office Wars 4 &#8211; Microsoft’s Assault on Lotus and IBM Why Does Microsoft Really Want Yahoo? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razorsedge</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator>razorsedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-6495</guid>
		<description>really, this article is outstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really, this article is outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suz5987</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-6026</link>
		<dc:creator>suz5987</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-6026</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone!
I’m doing a project on the Yahoo-Microsoft merger and have a few questions for somebody who has been following and understands this potential merge.  If you’re willing to help, please let me know! 
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone!<br />
I’m doing a project on the Yahoo-Microsoft merger and have a few questions for somebody who has been following and understands this potential merge.  If you’re willing to help, please let me know!<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surfish</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-5742</link>
		<dc:creator>surfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-5742</guid>
		<description>Eric Savitz must be stopped. He is polluting the marketplace regarding Apple. Go to Barrons and let him know about it in no uncertain terms. It&#039;s your investment, protect it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Savitz must be stopped. He is polluting the marketplace regarding Apple. Go to Barrons and let him know about it in no uncertain terms. It&#8217;s your investment, protect it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-5330</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/02/07/why-does-microsoft-really-want-yahoo/#comment-5330</guid>
		<description>Well done article, Dan. I just don&#039;t see how MS can pull a profit from this venture and then to have to borrow money to make the sale... that&#039;s ripe for disaster.

@L
That would be Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, who was in a bunch of late 80s/early 90s movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done article, Dan. I just don&#8217;t see how MS can pull a profit from this venture and then to have to borrow money to make the sale&#8230; that&#8217;s ripe for disaster.</p>
<p>@L<br />
That would be Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio, who was in a bunch of late 80s/early 90s movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

