<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:19:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Macworld 09 Infamy Awards &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>Macworld 09 Infamy Awards &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>[...] Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?  Most Unfortunately Named Product [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?  Most Unfortunately Named Product [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphaeus - think, design, create &#187; Archive &#187; &#187; Of winners and losers</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-9526</link>
		<dc:creator>alphaeus - think, design, create &#187; Archive &#187; &#187; Of winners and losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-9526</guid>
		<description>[...] There are winners and losers in life, and in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics, the heat and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger @ RoughlyDrafted) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are winners and losers in life, and in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics, the heat and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger @ RoughlyDrafted) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Krazit of CNET and Eric Savitz of Barrons Deny the Jesus Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Krazit of CNET and Eric Savitz of Barrons Deny the Jesus Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>[...] iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld? Vista vs Mac OS X Security: Why George Ou’s ZDNet Vulnerability Numerology is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld? Vista vs Mac OS X Security: Why George Ou’s ZDNet Vulnerability Numerology is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humann</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4433</link>
		<dc:creator>humann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4433</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but after seeing MacTV&#039;s picture quality on a (supposedly) better HDTV than I have I&#039;m very happy with my whip-and-buggy Netflix account. Maybe it&#039;s mostly the difference between a CRT and an LCD (I was watching a very dark scene from National Treasure) but it looked really bad in the Apple store, Glendale. I&#039;d really need to see them side by side to compare the resolution. I know the resolution specs are supposed to be better than DVD with the MacTV, but maybe my DVD/TV combo simply does better with its progressive upsampling/interpolation or whatever it&#039;s called.

Very subjective of course, but I was very surprised and disappointed with my first real-world experience with the MacTV experience. I&#039;m probably still going to get one so I can watch the BBC and Comedy Central without paying for ESPN, the Home Shopping Network and FOX too. But for movies I really hope they do look better than DVDs on my own set-up. I have some 2.5 year-old Sony DVD player and an $800 floor model of their 34&quot; HD CRT that I bought at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but after seeing MacTV&#8217;s picture quality on a (supposedly) better HDTV than I have I&#8217;m very happy with my whip-and-buggy Netflix account. Maybe it&#8217;s mostly the difference between a CRT and an LCD (I was watching a very dark scene from National Treasure) but it looked really bad in the Apple store, Glendale. I&#8217;d really need to see them side by side to compare the resolution. I know the resolution specs are supposed to be better than DVD with the MacTV, but maybe my DVD/TV combo simply does better with its progressive upsampling/interpolation or whatever it&#8217;s called.</p>
<p>Very subjective of course, but I was very surprised and disappointed with my first real-world experience with the MacTV experience. I&#8217;m probably still going to get one so I can watch the BBC and Comedy Central without paying for ESPN, the Home Shopping Network and FOX too. But for movies I really hope they do look better than DVDs on my own set-up. I have some 2.5 year-old Sony DVD player and an $800 floor model of their 34&#8243; HD CRT that I bought at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebob</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>ebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>&quot;Remote Disc networking and discovery software that makes an optical disc drive largely unnecessary.&quot;

NT-based operating systems, at least, have always had this in the form of \\system\cddrive$ (for system-dependent values of &quot;system&quot; and the &quot;cddrive&quot; letter).  That doesn&#039;t make me like Windows one whit better, mind you.  Just sayin&#039;.

I also thought the rag on Blue was too long for us who don&#039;t live in the SF media sphere.  And definitely too much personal attack in it.  But it&#039;s not my blog, just not what I want to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remote Disc networking and discovery software that makes an optical disc drive largely unnecessary.&#8221;</p>
<p>NT-based operating systems, at least, have always had this in the form of \\system\cddrive$ (for system-dependent values of &#8220;system&#8221; and the &#8220;cddrive&#8221; letter).  That doesn&#8217;t make me like Windows one whit better, mind you.  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
<p>I also thought the rag on Blue was too long for us who don&#8217;t live in the SF media sphere.  And definitely too much personal attack in it.  But it&#8217;s not my blog, just not what I want to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>Wow, an Amiga-head!  Been a long time since I&#039;ve seen one of those around.  Good on you, mate. 

Stuffit has severe flaws in my opinion, but it has some features that are irreplaceable as far as I know.  For one, you can password-protect archives. For another, you can inspect the contents of archives without expanding them. And following that, you can selectively extract specific files without having to un-stuff it all.

Still, it costs way too much for me to be happy about, and along with those unique features comes aggravating slowness and frustrating UI clumsiness. Every time I use it I wish somebody would kill it and slice it up and make something better out of the pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, an Amiga-head!  Been a long time since I&#8217;ve seen one of those around.  Good on you, mate. </p>
<p>Stuffit has severe flaws in my opinion, but it has some features that are irreplaceable as far as I know.  For one, you can password-protect archives. For another, you can inspect the contents of archives without expanding them. And following that, you can selectively extract specific files without having to un-stuff it all.</p>
<p>Still, it costs way too much for me to be happy about, and along with those unique features comes aggravating slowness and frustrating UI clumsiness. Every time I use it I wish somebody would kill it and slice it up and make something better out of the pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Complete Deconstruction Of Everything Else Left To Say &#187; Winners and losers</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Complete Deconstruction Of Everything Else Left To Say &#187; Winners and losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>[...] and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger)   Tagged with: No tag for this post.      No Comments so far  Leave a comment    RSS feed for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger)   Tagged with: No tag for this post.      No Comments so far  Leave a comment    RSS feed for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brau</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Brau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>@ Michael

Lol! Very funny.  Perhaps he should have taken her to the lost and found to locate her mommie, as she was clearly lost. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michael</p>
<p>Lol! Very funny.  Perhaps he should have taken her to the lost and found to locate her mommie, as she was clearly lost. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vasovski</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vasovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4346</guid>
		<description>Sorry. But did anyone happen to look up that chick&#039;s photos? My lexicon probably isn&#039;t as refined or as modern as hers. But when looking at her photos, descriptive words, such as: paperbag, bu-fu, and fugly came to mind.

I totally respect Steve for not wanting to take a photo with that. And it was totally polite, on his part, for not jumping ten feet back, when he realized what was touching him... I probably would&#039;ve yelped for security and a medic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. But did anyone happen to look up that chick&#8217;s photos? My lexicon probably isn&#8217;t as refined or as modern as hers. But when looking at her photos, descriptive words, such as: paperbag, bu-fu, and fugly came to mind.</p>
<p>I totally respect Steve for not wanting to take a photo with that. And it was totally polite, on his part, for not jumping ten feet back, when he realized what was touching him&#8230; I probably would&#8217;ve yelped for security and a medic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/comment-page-1/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>When &quot;Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?&quot; turned up in my RSS, I was fully expecting an article about MS Office 2008. Ho hum. ;)

StuffIt … what an appropriate name that has always been. Sit files used to be such a chore but they&#039;re few and far between these days, and usually a valuable message: best avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?&#8221; turned up in my RSS, I was fully expecting an article about MS Office 2008. Ho hum. ;)</p>
<p>StuffIt … what an appropriate name that has always been. Sit files used to be such a chore but they&#8217;re few and far between these days, and usually a valuable message: best avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
