<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  8 Oct 2008 06:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alphaeus - think, design, create &#187; Archive &#187; &#187; Of winners and losers</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-9526</link>
		<dc:creator>alphaeus - think, design, create &#187; Archive &#187; &#187; Of winners and losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-9526</guid>
		<description>[...] There are winners and losers in life, and in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics, the heat and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger @ RoughlyDrafted) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are winners and losers in life, and in accordance with the First Law of Thermodynamics, the heat and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger @ RoughlyDrafted) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Krazit of CNET and Eric Savitz of Barrons Deny the Jesus Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Krazit of CNET and Eric Savitz of Barrons Deny the Jesus Phone &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>[...] iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld? Vista vs Mac OS X Security: Why George Ou’s ZDNet Vulnerability Numerology is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iTunes Monopoly/Failure Myth Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld? Vista vs Mac OS X Security: Why George Ou’s ZDNet Vulnerability Numerology is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humann</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4433</link>
		<dc:creator>humann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4433</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but after seeing MacTV's picture quality on a (supposedly) better HDTV than I have I'm very happy with my whip-and-buggy Netflix account. Maybe it's mostly the difference between a CRT and an LCD (I was watching a very dark scene from National Treasure) but it looked really bad in the Apple store, Glendale. I'd really need to see them side by side to compare the resolution. I know the resolution specs are supposed to be better than DVD with the MacTV, but maybe my DVD/TV combo simply does better with its progressive upsampling/interpolation or whatever it's called.

Very subjective of course, but I was very surprised and disappointed with my first real-world experience with the MacTV experience. I'm probably still going to get one so I can watch the BBC and Comedy Central without paying for ESPN, the Home Shopping Network and FOX too. But for movies I really hope they do look better than DVDs on my own set-up. I have some 2.5 year-old Sony DVD player and an $800 floor model of their 34" HD CRT that I bought at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but after seeing MacTV&#8217;s picture quality on a (supposedly) better HDTV than I have I&#8217;m very happy with my whip-and-buggy Netflix account. Maybe it&#8217;s mostly the difference between a CRT and an LCD (I was watching a very dark scene from National Treasure) but it looked really bad in the Apple store, Glendale. I&#8217;d really need to see them side by side to compare the resolution. I know the resolution specs are supposed to be better than DVD with the MacTV, but maybe my DVD/TV combo simply does better with its progressive upsampling/interpolation or whatever it&#8217;s called.</p>
<p>Very subjective of course, but I was very surprised and disappointed with my first real-world experience with the MacTV experience. I&#8217;m probably still going to get one so I can watch the BBC and Comedy Central without paying for ESPN, the Home Shopping Network and FOX too. But for movies I really hope they do look better than DVDs on my own set-up. I have some 2.5 year-old Sony DVD player and an $800 floor model of their 34&#8243; HD CRT that I bought at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebob</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>ebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>"Remote Disc networking and discovery software that makes an optical disc drive largely unnecessary."

NT-based operating systems, at least, have always had this in the form of \\system\cddrive$ (for system-dependent values of "system" and the "cddrive" letter).  That doesn't make me like Windows one whit better, mind you.  Just sayin'.

I also thought the rag on Blue was too long for us who don't live in the SF media sphere.  And definitely too much personal attack in it.  But it's not my blog, just not what I want to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remote Disc networking and discovery software that makes an optical disc drive largely unnecessary.&#8221;</p>
<p>NT-based operating systems, at least, have always had this in the form of \\system\cddrive$ (for system-dependent values of &#8220;system&#8221; and the &#8220;cddrive&#8221; letter).  That doesn&#8217;t make me like Windows one whit better, mind you.  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
<p>I also thought the rag on Blue was too long for us who don&#8217;t live in the SF media sphere.  And definitely too much personal attack in it.  But it&#8217;s not my blog, just not what I want to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>Wow, an Amiga-head!  Been a long time since I've seen one of those around.  Good on you, mate. 

Stuffit has severe flaws in my opinion, but it has some features that are irreplaceable as far as I know.  For one, you can password-protect archives. For another, you can inspect the contents of archives without expanding them. And following that, you can selectively extract specific files without having to un-stuff it all.

Still, it costs way too much for me to be happy about, and along with those unique features comes aggravating slowness and frustrating UI clumsiness. Every time I use it I wish somebody would kill it and slice it up and make something better out of the pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, an Amiga-head!  Been a long time since I&#8217;ve seen one of those around.  Good on you, mate. </p>
<p>Stuffit has severe flaws in my opinion, but it has some features that are irreplaceable as far as I know.  For one, you can password-protect archives. For another, you can inspect the contents of archives without expanding them. And following that, you can selectively extract specific files without having to un-stuff it all.</p>
<p>Still, it costs way too much for me to be happy about, and along with those unique features comes aggravating slowness and frustrating UI clumsiness. Every time I use it I wish somebody would kill it and slice it up and make something better out of the pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Complete Deconstruction Of Everything Else Left To Say &#187; Winners and losers</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>The Complete Deconstruction Of Everything Else Left To Say &#187; Winners and losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>[...] and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger)   Tagged with: No tag for this post.      No Comments so far  Leave a comment    RSS feed for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and light generated by winners must result in a cold, dark shutout for an equal number of losers. (Daniel Eran Dilger)   Tagged with: No tag for this post.      No Comments so far  Leave a comment    RSS feed for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brau</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Brau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>@ Michael

Lol! Very funny.  Perhaps he should have taken her to the lost and found to locate her mommie, as she was clearly lost. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michael</p>
<p>Lol! Very funny.  Perhaps he should have taken her to the lost and found to locate her mommie, as she was clearly lost. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vasovski</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vasovski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4346</guid>
		<description>Sorry. But did anyone happen to look up that chick's photos? My lexicon probably isn't as refined or as modern as hers. But when looking at her photos, descriptive words, such as: paperbag, bu-fu, and fugly came to mind.

I totally respect Steve for not wanting to take a photo with that. And it was totally polite, on his part, for not jumping ten feet back, when he realized what was touching him... I probably would've yelped for security and a medic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. But did anyone happen to look up that chick&#8217;s photos? My lexicon probably isn&#8217;t as refined or as modern as hers. But when looking at her photos, descriptive words, such as: paperbag, bu-fu, and fugly came to mind.</p>
<p>I totally respect Steve for not wanting to take a photo with that. And it was totally polite, on his part, for not jumping ten feet back, when he realized what was touching him&#8230; I probably would&#8217;ve yelped for security and a medic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Muir</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4336</link>
		<dc:creator>John Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4336</guid>
		<description>When "Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?" turned up in my RSS, I was fully expecting an article about MS Office 2008. Ho hum. ;)

StuffIt … what an appropriate name that has always been. Sit files used to be such a chore but they're few and far between these days, and usually a valuable message: best avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;Who Was the Biggest Loser at Macworld?&#8221; turned up in my RSS, I was fully expecting an article about MS Office 2008. Ho hum. ;)</p>
<p>StuffIt … what an appropriate name that has always been. Sit files used to be such a chore but they&#8217;re few and far between these days, and usually a valuable message: best avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowededwookie</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>lowededwookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/01/22/who-was-the-biggest-loser-at-macworld/#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>@coolgraphix: "Apple’s built-in ZIP format is only useful when sending ZIPs to other Mac users. Send one to a PC user and they’ll notice a bunch of other odd stuff in the archive that Macs ignore."

That works the other way as well. I guess it's more a problem with ZIP than the OS.

Anyone here used to use an Amiga? Anyone remember LZX? That was an awesome compression utility that absolutely trounced ZIP and LHA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@coolgraphix: &#8220;Apple’s built-in ZIP format is only useful when sending ZIPs to other Mac users. Send one to a PC user and they’ll notice a bunch of other odd stuff in the archive that Macs ignore.&#8221;</p>
<p>That works the other way as well. I guess it&#8217;s more a problem with ZIP than the OS.</p>
<p>Anyone here used to use an Amiga? Anyone remember LZX? That was an awesome compression utility that absolutely trounced ZIP and LHA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
