<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/</link>
	<description>Daniel Eran Dilger in San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are software patents evil? &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-34187</link>
		<dc:creator>Are software patents evil? &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-34187</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft game of the 1990s, the second place loser (Apple, prominently, but also Netscape, Sun, WordPerfect, Lotus and many others) lost nearly everything, despite often having done much of the work that helped [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft game of the 1990s, the second place loser (Apple, prominently, but also Netscape, Sun, WordPerfect, Lotus and many others) lost nearly everything, despite often having done much of the work that helped [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Tremendous Apple vs. Adobe Flash Myths &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-26065</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Tremendous Apple vs. Adobe Flash Myths &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-26065</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Wars 3 – How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Wars 3 – How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readers Write: How Microsoft got Windows NT &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-19530</link>
		<dc:creator>Readers Write: How Microsoft got Windows NT &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-19530</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Wars 3 – How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Office Wars 4 – Microsoft&#8217;s Assault on Lotus and IBM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Wars 3 – How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Office Wars 4 – Microsoft&#8217;s Assault on Lotus and IBM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murall &#187; Por que a Microsoft quer o Yahoo?</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-18511</link>
		<dc:creator>Murall &#187; Por que a Microsoft quer o Yahoo?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-18511</guid>
		<description>[...] Plot to Kill QuickTime  Apple: iPhone Now Costs Less than Ballmer’s Lame Motorola Q  Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly  Os poderes monopolistas da Microsoft em decadência.  O negócio de buscas não está mais na [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Plot to Kill QuickTime  Apple: iPhone Now Costs Less than Ballmer’s Lame Motorola Q  Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly  Os poderes monopolistas da Microsoft em decadência.  O negócio de buscas não está mais na [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple partners IBM and Sun consider merger &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-17880</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple partners IBM and Sun consider merger &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-17880</guid>
		<description>[...] reunion was based on a shared mistrust of Microsoft, which had stolen Apple&#8217;s Mac interface and QuickTime code and abandoned IBM&#8217;s OS/2 partnership while launching an assault on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reunion was based on a shared mistrust of Microsoft, which had stolen Apple&#8217;s Mac interface and QuickTime code and abandoned IBM&#8217;s OS/2 partnership while launching an assault on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jailbreak stores plot to plunder iPhone app revenue &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-17763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jailbreak stores plot to plunder iPhone app revenue &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-17763</guid>
		<description>[...] then shelved support for its Office apps on the Mac in the early 90s, leaving Mac users without access to modern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then shelved support for its Office apps on the Mac in the early 90s, leaving Mac users without access to modern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The iPhone Multitouch Patent Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-17301</link>
		<dc:creator>The iPhone Multitouch Patent Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-17301</guid>
		<description>[...] Yikes link: Google: Go tell Apple to shove it. &#124; Tech Broiler &#124; ZDNet.com United States Patent: 7479949 Scratching the Surface of Microsoft&#8217;s New Table PC Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yikes link: Google: Go tell Apple to shove it. | Tech Broiler | ZDNet.com United States Patent: 7479949 Scratching the Surface of Microsoft&#8217;s New Table PC Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mac Malware Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-16940</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mac Malware Myth &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-16940</guid>
		<description>[...] The Unavoidable Malware Myth: Why Apple Won’t Inherit Microsoft’s Malware Crown Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Unavoidable Malware Myth: Why Apple Won’t Inherit Microsoft’s Malware Crown Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Apple&#8217;s Tim Cook Did Not Threaten Palm Pre &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-16815</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Apple&#8217;s Tim Cook Did Not Threaten Palm Pre &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-16815</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Why OS X is on the iPhone, but not the PC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Why OS X is on the iPhone, but not the PC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Disruptions in Technology, and How to Benefit &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-15800</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Disruptions in Technology, and How to Benefit &#8212; RoughlyDrafted Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.roughlydrafted.com/2007/09/10/office-wars-3-how-microsoft-got-its-office-monopoly/#comment-15800</guid>
		<description>[...] Office Wars 3 - How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Jean-Louis Gassée Returns from Obscurity… to Talk About MobileMe 3: Fantasy Disruption.  There&#8217;s also a third type of disruption: the highly anticipated disruptor that never materializes. In the early 90s, the Newton PDA and series of Pen Computing initiatives were widely hailed as systems that would rejigger the computing world. The stylus would replace the bulky keyboard and computing would go mobile. Gates issues a series of predictions about how rapidly this would happen, but it never really did. Outside of a few limited applications, the concept of pen computing died completely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Office Wars 3 &#8211; How Microsoft Got Its Office Monopoly Jean-Louis Gassée Returns from Obscurity… to Talk About MobileMe 3: Fantasy Disruption.  There&#8217;s also a third type of disruption: the highly anticipated disruptor that never materializes. In the early 90s, the Newton PDA and series of Pen Computing initiatives were widely hailed as systems that would rejigger the computing world. The stylus would replace the bulky keyboard and computing would go mobile. Gates issues a series of predictions about how rapidly this would happen, but it never really did. Outside of a few limited applications, the concept of pen computing died completely. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

